Tite doctypes: karnataka

Sri Vishwanatha vs Smt Rani W/O A Thangaraj on 22 January, 2010

passed in; SiCiNo.2. t99£3 on the tite ot the Pres-i.di"n.g Otticer ... Aodi. District Judge! l<olar.. attowingthe petition tited under Section 263 & 264 ot the Endian Succession Act to'--reixoke and'annut

Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S B Adi - Full Document

Ishappa @ Ishwarappa vs Kalakappa on 12 August, 2009

tite gift ﬁaad, heisi that the qasaatéem as? §ﬁ§S€%$§~§§ﬁ Q? ﬁefanﬁant 33 finat The iswer Agpeﬁaie

Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 35 - H N Das - Full Document

M/S Indus Towers Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial ... on 7 September, 2011

Karnataka High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Smt Siriyala vs B N Ramesh on 17 February, 2010

plaintiff and his vendor and even the "veryexisteiiee i_dF.__tite'iipl:1iiit schedule property, on the gt"()tin;;i "thttt

Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 19 - A Byrareddy - Full Document

H.R. Patel vs C.G. Venkatalakshamma And Anr. on 16 December, 1954

half the court-fee, he is bound to pay in case he tites a suit for possession only. It was not argued before us that

Karnataka High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs N Thippa Setty on 9 April, 2008

reach the conciusion as to whether there was faiiure on tite 'part of the assessee: to disclose foty and truly

Karnataka High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd vs Madhava Nair S/O Late Neelakartha on 23 April, 2010

Asuch a di.sp'tite'._;is"'ef 'i3ettyV V in nature, it can be normally-~--reso1Ved

Karnataka High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 3 - N Kumar - Full Document

State By Chikkodi Police Station vs Avadoot Shankar Jaikar on 21 September, 2011

JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1163/2006 (Al FL N tite 1 Child odi Pain 1ltWfl

Karnataka High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 3 - S B Adi - Full Document

Sri S Venkoji Rao vs The Bangalore Development Authority on 28 September, 2010

PETITIONER (BY SRI'; AND"; 'I V' . TITE'B;qINGALORE' DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ._ . {1"«C_IIOw<I)AIAI

Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 4 - R M Reddy - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Smt Malana Bai on 24 October, 2011

been Rs4,000/ (that is Rs600th 2000 But obviously the contribution to tite family \voulci not have been RaP 000 / after his retirement, that

Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 5 - B V Nagarathna - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results