M/S Indus Towers Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial ... on 7 September, 2011
JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1163/2006 (Al
FL N
tite 1
Child odi Pain 1ltWfl
been Rs4,000/ (that is Rs600th
2000 But obviously the contribution to tite family
\voulci not have been RaP 000 / after his
retirement, that
tIte'. ili--' P''i'i e sizt
Sieg Yosh i a ue
pes . . ao ie Ai
tite. . ok - "sean
. a goed Bred
elected Adhyaksha or the Upadhyaksha to accept
the same gracefully and face tite no confidence motion
and try. to win 'their confidence with good
read ir1i Secunit 34 ot tite
Indian Prnai
twwle
6 Mc hear I karmA Addit'onal Stat Public
Prosecutor fnr the State
ihin,u titi ( 1("iS ('sJnhI1::rL'n. lie %tite% 'ia:ii flIt
Sit lIZ V'ls 1 iii LlIr
also ng, a | 3.9.2009 was
after # the 1* respondent
sion of the
tite lande | in "question: + by taking pos
me an 11.3.2616 and. subsequently
ti3e ID by the
Labour court cannot b'tite_'be' 21431;: t_eeebe..p'e:fi;erse.
Points {iiiiwand