basis of educational
qualifications was upheld. In Narasing Rao case, Tracers
doing equal work were classified into two grades having
unequal pay, the basis
were before this Court in the said case
were employed as Tracers, carrying out the same duties and
1 AIR 1968 SC 349
15
responsibilities ... Bench held in that case that the classification
of Tracers, into two types with different grades of pay, on the basis
that one type consisted
Engineering for SDE
(Elec.) or equivalent with
five years experience.
c) Draftsman, Tracer with
AMIE of Engineers degree
in Civil Engineering for
SDE (Civil) with
petitioner joined in the
2nd respondent department as a Town Planning Tracer in the
year 1999, thereafter he was promoted as Building Inspector
opposite parties to regularize her service in the post of
Tracer with effect from the date she was brought into the
consolidated scale ... petitioner contended that the
petitioner was initially appointed as DLR Tracer vide order dated
12.08.1996 for a period of 44 days and was allowed
employees, namely Sri Tapas Kumar Jena, who is
working as Tracer and whose name finds place at serial no, 2(a) of
the impugned order
petitioner was daily wager employee, he was
working on the post of Tracer, but his
services were not regularized on the said
post ... dispute that the petitioner was
working on the post of Tracer but he was
appointed on the post of Assistant GradeIII
on 13.08.2008 vide
that the
petitioner's husband was appointed as a Work Charge Tracer vide Order dated
14.05.1985 and that the petitioner's husband died
Narasing Rao (cited supra) had categorically
held that giving different scales classifying tracers in the state as
Matriculate and non-Matriculate is valid
Narasing Rao (cited supra) had categorically
held that giving different scales classifying tracers in the state as
Matriculate and non-Matriculate is valid
