Diocesan Administrator vs M/S.Trishul Developers on 3 August, 2017
Govt. of Karnataka
C.R.P 67
Form No.9 (Civil)
Title Sheet ... Kanagarajan-Adv.]
Vs
Defendant : M/s.Trishul Developers
Rept. By its Managing Partner,
Sri.K.Prakash Shetty,
'Asha' No.9, Ali Akbar Cross
factual position in
the present case is that the conversion of Trishul
Developers the partnership firm as as limited company
by name TBIPL took place ... only Trishul
Developers will have to be assessed. The provisions of
s.170(2) cannot be involved for the simple reason that
the erstwhile firm
factual position in
the present case is that the conversion of Trishul
Developers the partnership firm as as limited company
by name TBIPL took place ... only Trishul
Developers will have to be assessed. The provisions of
s.170(2) cannot be involved for the simple reason that
the erstwhile firm
Raksha
Mantri had written on the file that they were developing
indigenous Trishul missile and it should be installed on our
Naval ships and that
M/S Gurmail Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 October, 2017
Equivalent
Motisons Global Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur vs Acit, Jaipur on 2 November, 2017
vk;dj vihyh
Dhaniram @ Guddu Yadav vs The State Of M.P. on 24 October, 2017
Author: Anurag
Rainbow Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur vs Acit, Jaipur on 6 November, 2017
vk;dj vihyh
Motisons Entertainment (India) Pvt. ... vs Acit, Jaipur on 9 November, 2017
vk;dj vihyh; vf
Dhananjay Kumar Yadav & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 24 January
