scope of Section 48 of the Act and is not only ultravires
the Act but is also hit by Articles ... public purpose'. Acquisition without
public purpose is not only ultravires the Act but also Articles 14 ,
21 and 300A of the Constitution. Section
whereby it was held that
Section 8 (3) (a) of the Act ultravires Article 14 of the Constitution of
India and the claimants were held ... Court held that Section 31 of Defence of India Act,
1971 is ultravires Article 14 of the Constitution of India and the
claimants were entitled
dated 10.03.2008 respectively purported to have been issued thereunder as arbitrary, illegal, ultravires and unconstitutional.
W.P.No.6940 of 2006 is preferred under Article ... dated 13.06.2007 issued by the second respondent as unconstitutional and ultravires the Electricity Act 2003.
W.P.No.24478 of 2008 is preferred under Article
Chapter
XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960
is ultravires Article 348 (1)(a) of the Constitution of
India. In the said ... Chapter
XVII of the Appellate Side Rules has been held to be
ultravires Article 348 of the Constitution of India and
directed further to follow
nature of mandamus declaring the notification
dated 12.06.2006 (Annexure P-6) ultravires the Act, 1992 and the
Constitution of India as the same is unreasonable ... that the notification dated 12.06.2006 cannot be
sustained as the same is ultravires the Section 5 of the Act, 1992.
When notice of motion
constitutional
provisions. Any appointment, thus, made without
following the procedure would be ultravires."
19
In Postmaster General, Kolkata & Others vs. Tutu Das (Dutta
constitutional
provisions. Any appointment, thus, made without
following the procedure would be ultravires."
In Postmaster General, Kolkata & Others vs. Tutu Das (Dutta
Punjab 166
held the rule prescribing limitation for preferring an application,
ultravires Section 96 of the Employees State Insurance Act 1948
empowering State Government
dated 30.4.1999 and quash the same as illegal and ultravires and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service.
For Petitioner
concluded that the rule suffers
from the vice of arbitrariness or ultravires Articles 14 and 16(1) of the
constitution. In any case, the petitioners