declaring that the practice of instantaneous triple talaq [Talaq-ul-biddat] was unconstitutional. The Bench observed that the fundamental right to equality guaranteed under Article
extrajudicial killings in Madras. Initial attempts to censor the press were ruled unconstitutional, leading the government to employ judicial decisions as justification for limiting freedom ... Supreme Court of India declared the 97th Amendment Act Unconstitutional. According to the Supreme Court ratification from states was necessary to pass the amendment which
read down Section 377 of the IPC criminalising "unnatural sex" as being unconstitutional. The Court upheld the right to equal citizenship of all members
Court, has declared Article 323A (2)(d) of
the Constitution to be unconstitutional to the extent it empowers
Parliament to exclude the jurisdiction ... additionally, Section 28 of the Act has also been held
to be unconstitutional to the extent it divests the High Courts of
jurisdiction under Article
officers who became/become noneffective on or after
that date"
are unconstitutional and are struck down with the
specification that the date mentioned therein ... being one from which the liberalised pension
scheme becomes operative. Omitting the unconstitutional part
it is declared that all pensioners governed by the 1972
Rules
court ruled that the practice of Talaq-e-biddat is illegal and unconstitutional. The court also held that an injunction would continue
fall within the scope of this provision and cannot be deemed unconstitutional. In another significant judgment, Maru Ram Etc. v. Union Of India
arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of the dignity of a woman and therefore, unconstitutional. Section 497 is considered as the wife's encroachment on her right ... discussion it was declared that:Section 497 is struck down as unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution.Section
declaring that the practice of instantaneous triple talaq [Talaq-ul-biddat] was unconstitutional. The Bench observed that the fundamental right to equality guaranteed under Article
AIYAR JJ.)-- The Bihar Land Reforms Act , XXX of 1950, is not
unconstitutional or void except with regard to the provi-
sions ... thereof. The provisions of
S. 4 (b) and s, 23 (f) are unconstitutional. Per PATAN-
JALI SASTRI C.J. and DAS J.--The whole