recovered from the
accused or from the witnesses. DNA testing
on samples such as saliva, skin, blood, hair or
semen not only helps to convict ... there is evidence to show tampering of the
samples, the DNA test report would be unsafe to be made a
basis for convicting the accused
recovered from the
accused or from the witnesses. DNA testing
on samples such as saliva, skin, blood, hair or
semen not only helps to convict ... there is evidence to show tampering of the
samples, the DNA test report would be unsafe to be made a
basis for convicting the accused
recovered from the
accused or from the witnesses. DNA testing
on samples such as saliva, skin, blood, hair or
semen not only helps to convict ... there is evidence to show tampering of the
samples, the DNA test report would be unsafe to be made a
basis for convicting the accused
recovered from the
accused or from the witnesses. DNA testing
on samples such as saliva, skin, blood, hair or
semen not only helps to convict ... there is evidence to show tampering of the
samples, the DNA test report would be unsafe to be made a
basis for convicting the accused
Forensic Science
Laboratory, Mumbai has stated that he did not receive the sample in a
thermos containing fetus. In view of this material inconsistency between ... custody of D.N.A. sample is seriously under cloud of suspicion. In the
above background, it is unsafe to rely upon
quite unsafe to record conviction of
the appellant barely on suspicion.
Drawing attention of this Court to the infirmities in the
samples sent
Court can direct him to give the blood for DNA
sample. Merely because he has given the
consent for taking the blood, then under such ... said
facts, I am of the considered opinion that it is
highly unsafe to rely upon the sole DNA test
to convict the person
essentially because all the samples were putrefied. The clothes, as per the
admission of the prosecutrix, had already been washed. The corroborative
evidence also does ... contradictions and improvements, but the possibility of it
being motivated, making it unsafe, to be made the basis of conviction.
20. Accordingly, we conclude that
Thus, the
statement of prosecutrix remained inconsistent, unreliable
and untrustworthy. It is unsafe to act upon on the basis of
her such single testimony ... seizure memo as Ex.PW1/C, and samples as
Ex.PW1/D. Thus PW2 is not a witness of occurrence.
12. Lastly
Rai Sandeep @ Deepu vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 7 August, 2012
Equivalent citations
