which
657 samples found Conform to Standard, 113
samples found Substandard and 16 samples
found Misbranded and two (2) samples found
Unsafe (Page ... Districts for
testing of Milk Samples and 3467 samples
were analysed, out of which four (4) samples
found Unsafe and 499 samples found
Substandard. (Page
Milk Products Sampling
1. Routine Milk and Milk product sampling (05.08.2011 to 31.05.2017)
(a) Milk sampling
(b) Milk products sampling
2. National Milk quality survey ... Milk samples were lifted from all 32 Districts, 886 samples lifted and analysed.
Out of which, no samples were found unsafe and 187 samples were
also not declared on the label, and thereby the said sample is unsafe and
misbraned. After accorded sanction, the respondent filed complaint on
04.10.2016 before ... Indian Item). Thereafter, sent the
sample of the said product for analysis and found that the sample is
unsafe and misbranded. After accorded sanction from
packets of
Raja Snacks Mixture to be taken as 3 samples, with each sample
consisting of 2 packets weighing 150 grams each. Upon seizure ... product from 20.02.2018 to 26.02.2018 and opined that the
said food sample was “unsafe” and “mis-branded” by the
report dated 07.03.2018. The respondent received
received on 30.11.2020. The Analyst report
had simply stated that the sample was unsafe. It has not mentioned as to
how and in what manner ... sample was unsafe. Absolutely, there is no
specific averment in the complaint that the customers being aggrieved
samples were sent for analysis,
that the designated officer, Dindigul has received the food analysis report, with
an opinion that the sample is unsafe, since ... product was analysed, the opinion of the
Food Analyst that the sample is unsafe, cannot be looked into.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Food Analyst had sent a report dated
21.01.2019 stating that the sample was unsafe and misbranded, that the
respondent, after obtaining necessary sanction from ... that therefore, the opinion of the Food Analyst
that the sample was unsafe cannot be looked into, as the same was analysed only
after
took samples of “Diabetics Dezire Natural” on paying
Rs.464/-. After purchasing the sample, he made appropriate sealing of the
samples, in the presence ... sample was taken on 16.12.2014, the Central Food
Laboratory report stating the food sample as 'unsafe and misbranded' was
received on 19.06.2015. Only
Sakthi) and in the presence of P.W.2 he had taken samples of 5 packets of Gingelly oil (Sakthi) and sent the same ... value of Iodine was very less. All these make the sample unsafe for use by virtue of its being sub-standard under Section
Sakthi) and in the presence of P.W.2 he had taken samples of 5 packets of Gingelly oil (Sakthi) and sent the same ... value of Iodine was very less. All these make the sample unsafe for use by virtue of its being sub-standard under Section
