Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 556 (0.05 seconds)

State vs . Naresh Kumar on 3 April, 2023

sent for FSL examination along with sample voice of accused. The FSL result dated 23.03.2018 confirmed the voice in the sting video to be that ... total 28 video shots contained in the DVD, and the segregated videos were given file names AVF1 to AVF12. The segregated videos were copied onto
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

25 vs . on 10 October, 2022

contained probable voice of Akshay and also that the video was in continuity. However, the FSL expert mentioned in the report that complete examination ... also not in accordance with law and therefore the FSL result stating that the questioned video contains voice of Akshay is useless. 14.2. Also, there
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

33 vs . on 10 October, 2022

copy of transcript of the questioned audio video recording to the FSL expert before comparison of voice by the expert. He also admitted that ... Sanction itself revealed that some other FSL result was mentioned in it instead of the FSL result of that case and also the Sanction Order
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Rahul Ranjan on 9 May, 2018

been   further   submitted   that   spy camera and memory card etc. containing obscene video of prosecutrix   in   compromising   position   with   accused   were ... Kumar ASJ (SFTC)-01, West THC, Delhi/09.05.2018 -: 24 :- seized.   FSL   report   in   this   respect   is   also   on   record.  The   evidence of prosecutrix
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next