Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 78 (0.79 seconds)

State vs 1. Rahul Ranjan on 9 May, 2018

been   further   submitted   that   spy camera and memory card etc. containing obscene video of prosecutrix   in   compromising   position   with   accused   were ... Kumar ASJ (SFTC)-01, West THC, Delhi/09.05.2018 -: 24 :- seized.   FSL   report   in   this   respect   is   also   on   record.  The   evidence of prosecutrix
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Sonu Desta on 3 May, 2014

FSL Rohini through Ct. Arun and also sent pullanda containing video recording to FSL, Rohini on 27.6.13 through Ct. Ashok. Copy of entry ... Copy of acknowledgment is Ex. PW11/C. PW11 sent video recording to FSL through road certificate No. 5021. Copy of same
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Amarjeet Yadav on 10 February, 2020

lacs to the accused, he will delete the video otherwise the video shall be handed over by him to media. Thereafter, the complainant found that ... possession of the accused were seized by IO and sent to FSL. The video from the memory card were thereafter transferred by FSL
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishal Tandon vs State on 2 February, 2021

mobile phone for sending same to FSL for establishing the authenticity of video recorded by the said phone. However, she refused and instead provided ... observed that each video file contains one identified video shot. There is no indication of alteration in the identified video shot on the basis
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - S K Kait - Full Document

State vs . Deenanath Page No. 1/16 on 14 September, 2017

mention   of   accused   making   the   obscene   video   of   the  prosecutrix. She made the allegations regarding making of obscene video  for   the   first   time   when ... FSL to know if any obscene  FIR No. : 1010/15 PS : Govindpuri State Vs. Deenanath Page No. 13/16 video was prepared by the accused
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs State Cri, Appeal No.8/2009 Decided On ... on 10 April, 2018

meantime,   accused   by   taking   the   advantage   of   prosecutrix and prepared obscene video clipping. Thereafter, the accused used   to   call   the   prosecutrix   to   his   house ... prosecutrix   and   accused   were   sent   to   FSL Rohini for examination. However, during the investigation no video clipping was recovered, hence, Mr. Arnav Kumar and Amit
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Neeraj Kumar And Krishan Kumar Gupta ... on 31 August, 2016

also   denied   that   the   accused   had  shown her, her obscene video.  8.    Perusal of the material available on record shows that no obscene  material ... accused Neeraj does not have any obscene videos /  photographs of the prosecutrix.  9.      Although   the   FSL   report   shows   that   semen   and   blood   were  detected
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next