father of the first plaintiff M. Lakshmiah Chetty and the vested remainder was granted in favour of the first plaintiff. Atchanna Chetty, the elder brother ... issue is concerned, the plaintiff contends that the contingent right viz., vested remainder gets crystalised only on the death of her father in the year
forth by the plaintiffs' counsel, the plaintiffs
being the vested remainder in respect of the suit properties and their
right would accrue only after ... gets the vested
interest in the suit property and on the death
of Govindaraj Iyengar, she gets the vested
remainder right in the suit property
life estate without any power of alienation and Chandrasekaran had the vested remainder. It was stated in the plaint that the sale by Nataraja, Mudaliar ... there was no plea on behalf of the appellant that the vested remainder of Chandrasekaran was conveyed to Choolai Sabapathi Mudaliar under
mother as limited estate owner) and the respondents/Plaintiffs as vested remainder holders) and further that the said property has been mortgaged by their father ... father and the Natural Guardian on behalf of the minor plaintiff (vested remainder holder) and further that the alienation made by the Natural Guardian without
favour of father of plaintiff, namely, Sri
Lakshmiah Chetty and vested remainder was given in favour of plaintiff.
The elder brother of plaintiff ... alienations do not affect the title of plaintiff who is the vested remainder and
the transactions
wife Adilakhsmi and thereafter to his
daughter Kalyani @ Sarathammal and the vested remainder shall go to his
grandsons, who are the first plaintiff ... under Exs.B1 and B6 and the vested
remainders were also parties to the sale deeds.
9. It is the submission of the learned
death. The first defendant was given with life estate and the vested remainder was settled to the second defendant when she was minor. After ... said property would devolve upon the second defendant. Therefore, the vested remainder on the second defendant when she was minor, cannot be disturbed
estate was created in favour of the second defendant and a vested remainder was created in favour of his three daughters in equal moieties ... possession of the properties as she is only entitled to a vested remainder after her life. The case that the price paid
plaintiff was a beneficiary, tenant or reversioner in the remainder. According to it the property vested in the trustees and they alone could maintain
only life interest in the suit property and the vested remainder belongs to the plaintiffs. The second defendant has no right to alienate or encumber ... suit property with a vacant site and that, the vested remainder has been given to the plaintiffs and that, the second defendant has no right
