Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

M/S. Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd vs Shankarprasad on 19 July, 1999 Equivalent citations: AIR

award of the punishment of dismissal showed that it amounted to victimisation or unfair labour practice. The learned Judge referred to what he called ... number of instances of victimisation against the workman such as refusal of permission to attend the Labour Commissioner's office on other occasions

order of termination was, however, characterised as being an act of victimisation of the workman on account of his trade union activities which were ... mala fide, an instance of colourable exercise of power and of victimisation, which entitled the workman to be reinstated. The workman was, therefore, directed

conclusion that the retrenchment was made mainly by way of victimising those workmen of the D. V. C. who were members of the Union ... Tribunal that the workmen concerned were retrenched by way of mere victimisation because they were the most vocal section of the Union on the ground

M/S. Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd vs Shankarprasad on 19 July, 1999 Author: S.B

workers of the union would by itself be no evidence to prove victimisation, for if that were so, it would mean that the office-bearers ... held as under:- “10. A word of caution is necessary. Victimisation is a serious charge by an employee against an employer, and, therefore, it must

further dealing with the term victimization has held as under; What is victimisation is again a multi- headed monster to tackle with. The word ... victimisation' is not defined in the Industrial Disputes Act . An attempt to describe 'unfair practices by employers' by a deeming definition

Patel that the  Labour Court has committed an error in considering the victimisation on  the ground that correct principle is not followed and the learned ... Single  Judge   has   also   dismissed   the   writ   petition   on   the   ground   of  victimisation.     12 Mr Patel has also relied upon the decision of the Apex

been inimical to the petitioner and therefore, it is a case of victimisation. Mr.V.Prakash, relied on two judgments of the Supreme Court ... Supreme Court has taken a view that the victimisation should be interpreted in a way to http://www.judis.nic.in  9 ensure that

been inimical to the petitioner and therefore, it is a case of victimisation. Mr.V.Prakash, relied on two judgments of the Supreme Court ... Supreme Court has taken a view that the victimisation should be interpreted in a way to ensure that an employee must not face, the wrath