Claims are
summarized as under:-
Claim No. 1 Towards outstanding/withheld
payments on account of PAC-
₹10.28 crores.
Claim No. 2 Towards outstanding/withheld
payments ... payments due, which led to disputes between the
parties.
15. Before the Arbitral Tribunal, L&T made claims for the payments
withheld; payments
were
addressedinter se departments in regard to release of withheld payment of the
petitioner, yet the paymentsdue to the petitioner were not released ... accord
consideration to the claim of the petitioner for release of withheld payment of
Rs.11,13,717/- and Rs.3,88,115 within some
said work
carried out by KSS, VML wrongfully withheld the said payment due and
payable to KSS by VML. Learned Senior Counsel invited our attention ... which were also
claimed on the basis of which it had withheld the payment of invoice of
April of US $ 7.16 million
parties,
the petitioner issued a notice dated 23.12.2019, requesting that the payments
withheld be released or, in the alternative, the matter be referred to
arbitration ... certain issues between respondent no. 1 and
respondent no. 3 regarding payments to be made to the petitioner and if the
said issues are reconciled
that is, after a delay of 478 days.
9. DSIIDC withheld part payments of the Final Bill and also made
certain recoveries from the amount ... other hand,
claimed that it was not only entitled to the payments withheld by
DSIIDC but was also entitled to compensation on account of
escalation
Khatian No. 269, J.L. No. 227, P.S. -Kharagpur
and withheld payment of the balance compensation
relating to the acquisition of the aforementioned three
Sei Aditi Power Private Limited & Ors vs Karnataka Electricity Regulatory ... on 14 July, 2021
matter in hand on the ground that the act of non-payment of
dues by a government company affects public interest at
large; a negative ... amounts, despite which
the Respondent No. 2 has arbitrarily and repeatedly
withheld payments due to the Petitioners. The issues of
arbitrariness by the State
wherein, from the date of entitlement
till the date of payment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
proceeded to award interest @ 9% per annum, both ... needless to mention that the
respondents have erroneously withheld payment of
gratuity amount for which the appellants herein
are entitled in law for payment
they stopped the payment. The petitioner
has also enclosed a copy of the chart (Exhibit "B") showing details
of payment made ... Godbole, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that
the respondents have withheld payment of market fees by relying
upon clause (B) (ii) of Chapter
