Court following the seven-Judges Bench decision of this Court in A.R.
Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak [(1988) 2 SCC 602] opined that ... save and except certain contingencies of cases, would be a nullity. In
A.R. Antulay (supra), this Court held:
"No prejudice need be proved
order of court. This Court in the case of
A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak , AIR paras 40 to 42
wherein it is, inter ... violated, the judgment would be a nullity. Strong reliance
in this behalf has been placed on A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak
Jayendra Vishnu Thakur vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 May, 2009
Equivalent citations: 2009 AIR
sanctioning authority. The
sanction to prosecute is an important matter; it
constitutes a condition precedent to the institution
of the prosecution and the Government have ... does not arise at this stage"
11. In R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay [(1984) 2 SCC 183] following Mohd.
Iqbal Ahmed (supra
Reference was made to a Constitution Bench
Judgment of this Court in the case of Abdul Rehman
Antulay v. R. S. Nayak ... other relevant
circumstances of that case.
In the case of A. R. Antulay (supra), this Court
gave propositions meant to serve as guidelines. This
Court
Abdul Rehman Antulay v. R.S. Nayak
while interpreting the scope of Article 21 of the
Constitution held that every citizen has a right ... taking into consideration the several
relevant factors as pointed out in A.R. Antulay
case and decide whether the trial or proceedings
have become
a Civil suit shall be instituted in the Court of lowest stage competent to try a suit. The jurisdiction of a court to entertain a ... productive.
73. In A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak (reported in (1988) 2 SCC 602: (AIR 1988 SC 1531) a constitution bench
a case where the petitioners
are questioning an order passed by a competent court
in a collateral proceeding although in a given
situation ... withdraw or review such
order. In A.R. Antulay v. R.S.Nayak and Anr. a Bench of seven Judges of the Supreme
Court held
whether Section 3 (2) (d) of the
Act requires any interpretation or a construction which would
exclude Police Officers from becoming member of the
Commission ... a general provision instead of delving in search of any
possible hidden or implied exclusion. It was so said in A.R.
Antulay v. Ramdas
A procedural impropriety is also one of the grounds for which power of judicial review can be exercised.
79. In fact, in S.A ... this connection may also be made to A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak , .
81. A citizen of India is entitled to the safeguards provided
