Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
state for the purpose of Article 12. In A.R.Antulay v. R.S.Nayak and N.S.Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 7652 (2.62 seconds)A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 29 April, 1988
Antulay vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 29 April, 1988
Equivalent citations: 1988 AIR 1531, 1988 SCR SUPL. (1) 1, AIR 1988 SUPREME COURT ... Mukharji , Misra Rangnath , G.L. Oza , B.C. Ray
PETITIONER:
A.R. ANTULAY
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
R.S. NAYAK & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT
Constitution of India
state for the purpose of Article 12. In A.R.Antulay v. R.S.Nayak and N.S.Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra & Anr on 10 April, 2002
Limited [1898
(1) Q.B. 669]." (Emphasis supplied)
In A.R.Antulay vs. R.S.Nayak & Anr. [1988 (2) SCC
602], the question ... holding trial from day to day. [ R.S.Nayak vs.
A.R.Antulay (1984) 2 SCC 183 at 243], was a valid order
P. Ramachandra Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2002
invited to the decision of an earlier Constitution Bench in
Abdul Rehman Antulay and Ors.Vs. R.S. Nayak ... cases ran counter to the Constitution
Bench directions in Abdul Rehman Antulay's case, the latter being
five-Judge Bench decision, the appeals deserved
R.S. Nayak vs A.R. Antulay & Anr on 17 April, 1986
Nayak vs A.R. Antulay & Anr on 17 April, 1986
Equivalent citations: 1986 AIR 2045, 1986 SCR (2) 621, AIR 1986 SUPREME COURT ... Bhagwati , Misra Rangnath
PETITIONER:
R.S. NAYAK
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
A.R. ANTULAY & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT17/04/1986
BENCH:
BHAGWATI
Abdul Rehman Antulay & Ors vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 10 December, 1991
Abdul Rehman Antulay & Ors vs R.S. Nayak & Anr on 10 December, 1991
Equivalent citations: AIR 1992 SUPREME COURT ... Reddy
CASE NO.:
Writ Petition (crl.) 833 of 1990
PETITIONER:
ABDUL REHMAN ANTULAY & ORS.
RESPONDENT:
R.S. NAYAK & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT
A. R. Antulay vs Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak And Another on 16 February, 1984
Antulay vs Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak And Another on 16 February, 1984
Equivalent citations: 1984 AIR 718, 1984 SCR (2) 914, AIR 1984 SUPREME COURT ... Chinnappa Reddy , A.P. Sen , V. Balakrishna Eradi
PETITIONER:
A. R. ANTULAY
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
RAMDAS SRINIWAS NAYAK AND ANOTHER
DATE OF JUDGMENT16/02/1984
Securities And Exchange Board Of India vs Classic Credit Ltd. on 21 August, 2017
Court. This provision is
not like the one in A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak (1988) 2 SCC 602
where under Section ... Magistrate was not a court
of exclusive jurisdiction as in Antulay case. The offence was a
non-cognizable one, and therefore it was not mandatory
R. S. Nayak vs A. R. Antulay on 16 February, 1984
Nayak vs A. R. Antulay on 16 February, 1984
Equivalent citations: 1984 AIR 684, 1984 SCR (2) 495, AIR 1984 SUPREME COURT ... Balakrishna Eradi
PETITIONER:
R. S. NAYAK
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
A. R. ANTULAY
DATE OF JUDGMENT16/02/1984
BENCH:
DESAI, D.A.
BENCH:
DESAI