solely concerning the admissibility
of the results of the test, not whether a DNA test could be ordered in the
first instance.
38 Nandlal Wasudeo ... proceedings therein were regarding a prayer for divorce
based on adultery. The DNA test was to be conducted to prove that the
wife was adulterous
DNA test may be ordered against an unwilling party at the
first instance.
41) In Dipanwita Roy (supra), this Court directed a DNA test ... context of a petition for divorce on the ground of adultery. The DNA test
was sought to establish the wife’s infidelity in order
DNA Test, it would be impossible for the husband to confirm the
assertions made in the pleadings. DNA Testing is the most legitimate and
scientifically ... ANIL
KUMAR BHATT
Signing Date:17.07.2025
18:38:23
DNA Test may establish the adultery/infidelity relationship which may be
impossible otherwise, but each case
solely concerning the admissibility of the results of the
test, not whether a DNA test could be ordered in the first
instance.
50. In Dipanwita ... proceedings therein were regarding a prayer
for divorce based on adultery. The DNA test was to be
conducted to prove that the wife was adulterous
power
to direct a person to undergo medical tests,
including a DNA test and such an order would
not be in violation of the right ... such a
test becomes indispensable to resolve the
controversy, the court can direct such test.
Further, a direction to conduct DNA test of a
child
DNA
test. In the said case, the husband had taken a specific plea of
non-access. Further, the court accepted that a DNA test would ... adultery could be
3
(2024) 7 SCC 773
25
proved. However, facts of the present case neither warrant a
direction to conduct a DNA test
DNA Test is that the minor child/the 2nd
Respondent did not born through him and in order to prove his case,
DNA test ... that a DNA test would be the only way, in which the truth of the matter
can be established. The DNA Testing cannot be used
test. Further, on the appellant declining
to subject Master Arjun to a paternity test, no adverse
inference can be drawn as regards the alleged adultery ... that a DNA test would be the only way, in which the truth of
the matter can be established. The DNA Testing cannot be used
test. Further, on the appellant declining to
subject Master Arjun to a paternity test, no adverse inference
can be drawn as regards the alleged adultery ... that a DNA test would be the only way, in which the truth of the matter
can be established. The DNA Testing cannot be used
time when
modern scientific tests such as DNA tests, as well as
ribonucleic acid tests ("RNA tests" for short), were not in
contemplation ... DNA test
reveals that the child was not born to the husband, the
conclusiveness in law would remain irrebuttable. What
would be proved, is adultery
