stretch of imagination it can be said to be
[Agarbatti or 'Dhoop' and it cannot also be used 'during religious rites ... goods Rate of duty
1 2 3 4
33.07 3307.41 - 'Agarbatti', 'Dhoop' Nil
and similar preparations is whatever form
___________3307.49_________-Other
plaint) in respect of the same
products viz. incense sticks, agarbattis and perfumery included in
class 3. In the application, the defendant claimed user since ... MANGALDEEP" alone.
23. The defendant contended that its agarbattis are sold under the
SRP 17/38
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013
which is identical and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs' RANGOLI Agarbatti (Essence stick) label. Defendants are apparently using words 'SAI RANGILI ... time.
2.2. The original defendants are trying to pass off the goods Agarbattis (Essence sticks) by making/using similarly deceptive trade mark. The label used
case, the Additional Sales Tax Tribunal is correct in holding that agarbattis should be taxed as 'perfumery' article coming under the purview ... provided for taxing luxury goods, when he recorded a specific finding that agarbattis are not luxury goods ?
2. Section 5 of the Orissa Sales
basis of the final artistic work was given the label of Ramayan Agarbatti. They are using the said label of Ramayan since 1981 and their ... product of the appellants is popular, he started manufacturing the incense sticks (Agarbatti) under the same label of Ramayan. Respondent No. 2 illegally adopted
Priya Darsan Agarbatti vs State Of M.P. And Ors. on 25 August, 1994
Equivalent citations: (1995)IILLJ1084MP, 1995(0)MPLJ326
Author: Chief Justice
Bench ... Bhat, C.J.
1. The five petitioners are engaged in manufacture of Agarbatti in Sagar district. They have filed this writ petition challenging Annexure
carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of dhoop and agarbatti and the firm is registered under the Punjab General Sales ... which related to the sale of dhoop and agarbatti at 6 per cent. in accordance with Section 5 of the Act. The petitioner was served
Shalimar Agarbatti Company vs N. Ranga Rao And Sons on 3 June, 2004
Equivalent citations: 2004(29)PTC247(IPAB)
JUDGMENT
S. Jagadeesan, Chairman
Handicraft
60.
Havan samagri including dhoop, sambrani or lobhana commonly known as agarbatti, dhupkathi or dhuphati
61.
Herb, bark, dry plant, dry root, commonly known
also not been registered. Seizure of six
pieces of 'Moksh Agarbatti Cover' from the house of PW5
appears to be redundant, unnecessary ... misleading,
moreso PW5 has denied production of the Agarbatti cover
pieces and panchanama drawn as per Ex.P.69.
• The prosecution has utterly failed