Baldu vs Nizam on 16 January, 2017
find that the petitioner has not filed copy of Plaint,
WS, amendment application and reply thereof.
Let all these documents be placed on record
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 192 (0.68 seconds)Nagdev & Ors. vs . M/S. Lark Laboratories India Ltd. Id ... on 3 June, 2017
also moved on behalf of
management dated 27.08.2010 for amendment of the WS. The application of the
workman U/s. 33 (2A) was dismissed vide ... order dated 01.09.2011. The application
of the management for amendment in the WS was also dismissed vide a separate
order dated 01.09.2011. In the application
West Bengal Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1972
section 36;] [Inserted by the West Bengal Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1975, section 2(a).] (c) "broker" means an agent whose ordinary course ... trader licensed under section 13;] [Inserted by the WS Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1978, section 2(b).] (f) [ "local authority" means
Section 2 in West Bengal Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
section 36;] [Inserted by the West Bengal Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1975, section 2(a).] (c) "broker" means an agent whose ordinary course ... trader licensed under section 13;] [Inserted by the WS Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1978, section 2(b).] (f) [ "local authority" means
Ekkaladevi Devaiah vs Bojja Laxmi And Others on 30 June, 2017
challenge, contended that when the first
respondent failed to cross-examine P.Ws.1 and 2 and failed to
adduce evidence, the course open ... Ws.1
and 2 and the court observed that though the counsel for
respondents 1 and 6 received affidavits of P.Ws
Samuthuiraraj vs State Represented By on 18 May, 2017
examination of the prosecution witnesses on application filed by the
prosecution. P.Ws.1 to 3 were examined in chief prior to impleading ... entitled to
have fresh trial after amendment of charges, since the cross-examination of
P.Ws.1 to 3 was already deferred
Ravindra Singh & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 March, 2017
petition of the
petitioners/accused to recall P.Ws. 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 after
amendment of charge, on the ground that no prejudice
Shri Jagat Guru Shankrachariya Swami ... vs Plroprietor Mahawar Traders Shri ... on 24 October, 2017
dated
04.10.2016 passed by 18th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur
allowing application for amendment at the stage of final
hearing of the appeal arising ... Similar applications for amendment were submitted
before the trial Court and the same were rejected by
successive orders.
2. In the WS the plea
Pradeep Shukla vs Union Of India on 3 July, 2017
above.
4. In partial amendment of the Boards letter No. PCIII/73/WS/Incentive Bonus dated 24.6.1978, the hourly rate of Incentive Bonus
Cs No. 173/16 Wazir Singh vs . Vikrant Singh on 31 March, 2017
moved on behalf of
defendant nos. 1 to 4 seeking amendment in the WS to
incorporate the fact that plaintiff had sold his one half ... such, plaintiff had no locus to institute
present suit. Such proposed amendment however was
declined by ld Predecessor of this court vide order