Gurdial Singh & Ors vs Raj Kumar Aneja & Ors on 4 February, 2002
Equivalent citations: AIR 2002 SUPREME COURT ... PETITIONER:
GURDIAL SINGH & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
RAJ KUMAR ANEJA & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/2002
BENCH:
R.C. Lahoti & Brijesh Kumar
Kailash Rani Dang vs Rakesh Bala Aneja & Anr on 12 December, 2008
Equivalent citations: AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT ... 1957-1958 of 2008
Kailash Rani Dang ..... Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Bala Aneja & Anr. .....
Respondents
JUDGMENT
HARJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These
Ashok Kumar Aneja vs Union Of India Through on 20 November, 2008
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH
OA No. 24/2007
New Delhi, this ... VICE CHAIRMAN (A)
HONBLE MRS. MEERA CHHIBBER, MEMBER (J)
Ashok Kumar Aneja,
S/o Shri Kundan Lal Aneja,
Aged about 59 years
Aneja vs Delhi Development Authority And Ors. on 16 May, 1988
Equivalent citations: AIR1989DELHI17, 1988(2)ARBLR167(DELHI), 35(1988)DLT294, 1988(16)DRJ345
giving rise to this appeal
Reason:
are:
The Company, namely, M/s. Aneja Consultancy
(hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') was
founded ... year 1984 by one I.J. Aneja as
Chairman. Father of the appellant, Major P.C. Sahay
(Retd.) joined the Company as Branch Manager
Neena Aneja vs Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. on 16 March, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 1441, AIRONLINE 2021 SC 143
Author ... INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Appeal Nos. 3766-3767 of 2020
Neena Aneja & Anr. .... Appellants
Versus
Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. .... Respondent
Signature Not Verified
Surolia, the learned counsel for the Revenue, and Shri S.L. Aneja, the learned counsel for the assessee.
10. We will first take ... Commissioner and the Tribunal have erred in allowing the said deduction. Shri Aneja has, on the other hand, supported the findings recorded by the Appellate
Priknit Retails Ltd. vs Aneja Agencies on 8 February, 2013
Author: Manmohan Singh
Bench: Manmohan Singh
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ... 2012
PRIKNIT RETAILS LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through Ms.Arundhati Katju, Adv.
versus
ANEJA AGENCIES ..... Respondent
Through Mr.R.G. Srivastava, Adv. with
Mr.D.K. Goswami
that one of the attesting witnesses of the will namely Om Parkash Aneja, Advocate has duly proved the execution and registration of the will ... presence of Ganga Ram Testator and other attesting witness Shri Om Parkash Aneja, Advocate Dw3 and it was evident that Sukh Ram Dass Witness
Suman Aneja vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 August, 1993
Equivalent citations: AIR1994P&H56, AIR 1994 PUNJAB AND HARYANA 56, 1993 PUNJ
