Commissioner/2004 dated 30.09.2004 Passed by Commissioner Central Excise, Noida]
Subhash Aneja, MD
Appellant
Vs.
CCE, Noida
Respondent
Present for the Appellant : Shri ... NOIDA/12 dated 31.01.2012 Passed by Commissioner Central Excise, (Appeal), Noida]
Subhash Aneja, MD
Appellant
Vs.
CCE, Noida
Respondent
Present for the Appellant : Shri
Harish Aneja & Others vs Cce, Meerut Ii on 30 May, 2013
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
West Block ... circulated to the Department Authorities?
Yes
M/s Harish Aneja & Others Appellant
Vs.
CCE, Meerut II Respondent
Appearance:
Shri A.K. Batra
Aneja Steels vs Cce, Noida on 13 May, 2015
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
West Block No. 2, R.K. Puram ... Whether order is to be circulated to the Department Authorities?
M/s Aneja Steels Appellant
Vs.
CCE, Noida Respondent
Appearance:
None - for the Appellant
Shri
Narendra Kumar Aneja vs Commissioner Of Service Tax-I, Mumbai on 28 July, 2017
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL ... passed by the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals), Mumbai-I).
Narendra Kumar Aneja
Appellant
Vs.
Commissioner of Service Tax-I, Mumbai
Respondent
Appearance:
None
Shri Dinesh Aneja vs C.C. Kandla on 16 February, 2018
In The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad ... passed by Commissioner (Appeals) of Customs, Ahmedbad)
Shri Dinesh Aneja : Appellant (s)
Versus
C.C. Kandla : Respondent (s)
Represented by:
For Appellant (s) : Shri
investigated the matter. They recorded the statements dated
07.09.2012 of Shri Dinesh Aneja, Prop. of M/s. WLSI who stated that New
Delhi and Sydney ... There was also proposal to impose penalty on Shri Dinesh Aneja, Prop. of
M/s. WLSI, M/s. Geo Chem Laboratories Pvt. Limited, Mumbai
Appellant(s)
VS
CCE & ST, Panchkula.
:
Respondent(s)
========================================
Appearance:
Sh. Girish Aneja, CA for the Appellant(s)
Sh. V. Gupta, AR for the Respondent
Johnson Mattey Chemical India P. Ltd. Vs. Commr. Of Central Excise
Kanpur10
Aneja Construction V. Commissioner of Service Tax 11
Central Warehousing Corporation V. Commissioner
paid by their client. Similarly their another
client M/s Aneja Constructions India Limited had to pay an amount of
Rs. 48.11/- Lakhs to them ... their clients namely M/s Inox Wind Limited, Noida and M/s Aneja
Constructions India Limited did not clear their bills. We therefore feel
that
Johnson Mattey Chemical India P. Ltd. versus
Commissioner Of C. Ex , Kanpur8
Aneja Construction versus Commissioner of
Service Tax9
Central Warehousing Corporation versus
Commissioner
