2011 FOR DIRECTING 1ST DEFENDANT TO
ANSWER INTERROGATORIES.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN I.A.NO.1449/2015
DATED
Where any party fails to comply
with any order to answer interrogatories, or for
discovery or inspection of documents, he shall, if
a plaintiff
counsel. Respondent filed fresh vakkalath.
Respondent directed to file proper answer to
interrogatories. For evidence to 16.9.2014.
16.9.2014: Both parties absent, represented by counsels ... answer to interrogatories and evidence to
24.10.2014.
24.10.2014: petitioner and respondent absent, represented
by counsels. For evidence to 10.12.2014.
10.12.2014: Petitioner as well as counter
leave to serve interrogatories on
the landlord. The interrogatories were also framed in such a manner
that the answers sought to be elicited were ... accompanying that application on the landlord and
directed the landlord to answer the interrogatories.
5. The rent control petition discloses that the landlord has prayed
MUNSIFF'S COURT, KOYILANDY
P2: COPY OF THE ANSWER TO THE INTERROGATORY IN EA NO.242/2014 ... substantial portion thereof.
4. In the answer to the interrogatories the
petitioner admitted that he gets 11,400/- as monthly
pension. It was on this
defendant has been allowed to serve
interrogatories to the plaintiff, in a suit for money. In the
meantime, the original plaintiff, who is the respondent ... order has become
infructuous as the deceased plaintiff ought to have
answered the interrogatories. It seems that the court below
has allowed the serving
5119/2014 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT SEEKING LEAVE
TO ANSWER THE INTERROGATORIES TO THE PLAINTIFF.
EXT. P4- THE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED
Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking
leave to serve interrogatories to the defendants 1 to
4. After considering the objection raised ... submit that they are ready to give answer to the
interrogatories, notwithstanding the order rejecting
the request of the petitioners.
3. In view
that tenant in R.C.P.No.61/2005
may have filed interrogatories as I.A.No.4447/2010 to claim the
protection of first ... business purposes.
We have already dealt with this matter, while answering the contention
of the petitioner in R.C.R.No.67/2014. This therefore