registrable;
(v) The parties to the family arrangement must have some
antecedent title, claim or interest, even a possible claim
in the property which ... person and acknowledges him to be the sole owner,
then, the antecedent title must be assumed and the family
arrangement will be upheld
consent decree and since there was no antecedent title vested in defendant Ram Karan, therefore the same required registration. On the strength of the aforesaid ... parties to the family arrangement must have some antecedent title, claim or interest even a possible claim in the property which is acknowledged
every inch of
the joint property. He was, thus, having antecedent title, in the
property. In the plaint of the previous suit ... heirs, but even those persons, who may have some sort of
antecedent title, a semblance, or a claim or even if they have spes
succession
parties to the family
arrangement must have some antecedent title,
claim or interest even a possible claim in the
property which is acknowledged ... person and
acknowledges him to be the sole owner, then
the antecedent title must be assumed and the
family arrangement will be upheld
registered or for that matter as an evidence of an
antecedent title. The High Court observed as follows: The
decision in Ram Gopal v. Tishi ... arrangement parties have antecedent title and a person having no title at
all cannot be called to have antecedent title and therefore if by such
Hari Om Gupta vs Krishan Garg on 8 August, 2024
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL
coparcener and therefore was not having antecedent title in the
property in dispute. According to the memorandum of family
settlement dated 15.11.2018 she received this ... parties to the
family arrangement must have some antecedent title,
claim or interest even a possible claim in the property
which is acknowledged
title for the first time. In other words, partition does not give title or create title. If the party to the partition has an antecedent ... person whose title in the said property, to another person who has no title. In a partition, no one transfers title which he possesses
plaintiff in a suit for ejectment must prove not only his antecedent title but also his possession within twelve years of the suit then ... suit for ejectment the plaintiff must prove not only his antecedent title and possession but also that he has been in possession within twelve years
proposition that a doubtful claim based on the allegation of an antecedent title is not essential for the validity of a family arrangement; such arrangement ... case had some title to the property. The daughters' title was in praesenti and was a vested one; the title of the daughters
