that stage, the
workers' union of TJML also filed their intervention application before the Hon'ble
Apex Court as a matter of precaution ... petitioners before the
High Court, the Apex Court rejected their intervention application by an order
dated 25.10.2016 while dismissing the Civil Appeal
67750/2022 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA
No.67360/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION IA No.
71746/2022 - STAY APPLICATION)
WITH ... 27982/2021 -
EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 86234/2021 - INTERVENTION
APPLICATION IA No. 78477/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA
No.77708/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION
existing on 16.10.2020.
4. After the order dated 16.10.2020, intervention
application, bearing I.A. No. 1 of 2020, was filed by the
successful tenderer ... fresh tender. Considering the reasons
mentioned in the intervention application, the intervenor was
allowed to be added as party.
5. On 07.01.2021, details submissions were
have just passed. We cannot pass
such an order in an Intervention
application. The only purpose of
granting an intervention
application is to entitle ... barred by principle of constructive res judicata due to filing of intervention application by one Sandeep Bansal for the benefit of other students
AMEND THE PRAYER ON BEHALF
OF PETTION, IA No. 81286/2018 INTERVENTION APPLICATION, IA
No. 2027/2020 INTERVENTION APPLICATION, IA No. 127368/2018
INTERVENTION APPLICATION ... 58124/2017 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA
No. 57812/2017 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 127023/2018 –
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 71929/2019 –
INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT, IA No. 2085
Article 25 also deserves to be given due consideration.
47. Another application for intervention, being I.A No. 91250 of
2018, was filed ... does not
violate the constitutional rights of a person.
54. Another application for intervention, being I.A No. 9341 of
2011, was filed and allowed
Ministry of
Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India).
Interventions against the appellant
27. Intervention application has also been filed by one Ananda
Sakharam Jadhav ... continues at disturbing level which necessitated
amendment in the Act.
29. Further intervention has been sought by one Yogendra
Mohan Harsh. Learned counsel
consequential benefits except financial
benefits.
20. Several intervention applications have been filed in these appeals
including intervention application filed by the SC/ST candidates
were also impleaded as respondents. Some similarly situated
promotees filed the intervention application which was allowed. Writ Peti-
tion No. 4852 of 1989 was then
Anil Sabharwal vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 21 March, 1997
Equivalent citations: (1997
