Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 49 (0.52 seconds)

Friday vs Union Of India Represented By on 11 February, 2011

consideration for transferring them as Trackmen to Thiruchirappalli Division, in preference to those Act Apprentices, who stand allotted vide Annexure A-8 order ... allege that the proposed action to appoint 60 Act Apprentices against DR quota vacancies, in preference to them is arbitrary, discriminatory and illegal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prasanth D P vs M/O Defence on 19 February, 2019

what is now available to the ex-naval 4 apprentices is a preference for direct recruitment, other things being equal. Respondents issued Annexure A3 notification ... employer to offer any employment to any apprentice after the successful completion of apprentice training. As per Annexure A1 60% of the posts of designated
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms Madhu vs M/O Defence on 31 August, 2017

Annexure A-4 Recruitment Rules, was absorption of ex-Naval Apprentice failing which by promotion and failing that by transfer and failing both by direct ... Electrician which arose after 29.12.1987 considering them as Ex- Naval Apprentices entitled to first preference under the Recruitment Rules. By way of implementation of Annexure
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.N. Shashikumar vs Union Of India on 26 August, 2011

Moreover, we feel that being No. 1 in the select list of Apprentice Trainees, the applicant has accrued a legal right for an option ... posted in Palghat Division after completion of the Traffic Apprentice training in preference to others in the select list." 10. As per the provisions
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T Sajeev Kumar vs M/O Defence on 26 July, 2023

service profile of the applicant. He had entered service as Act Apprentice on 11.09.1979, then was regularized on 23.02.1983. After putting in more than ... also not disputed that Annexure A-2 appeal was preferred on 08.01.2004 before the 2nd respondent, the appellate authority. By that time more than
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next