case where the suit is adjourned on the application of a party and he is in default at the adjourned hearing. This is what ... That was a case where the suit was adjourned automatically by the Court and not at the request of the party. The decision in Natesa
they were under the bonafide
impression that the EP would be adjourned automatically as it was being
done earlier because of the order passed
before 05.11.2024, failing which, the
application would be dismissed automatically and adjourned the case on
06.11.2024. Thereafter, Indira Selvam/third defendant has filed ... before
05.11.2024, failing which, the application would be dismissed automatically
and adjourned the case on 06.11.2024. Thereafter, Indira Selvam/third
defendant has preferred
before 05.11.2024, failing which, the application
would be dismissed automatically and adjourned the case on 06.11.2024.
Thereafter, Indira Selvam/plaintiff has filed ... before
05.11.2024, failing which, the application would be dismissed automatically
and adjourned the case on 06.11.2024. Thereafter, Indira Selvam/plaintiff
has filed
judis
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1146 of 2024
will be automatically adjourned with a direction to ensure all the witnesses
are available
bona fide. Accordingly, the case was
adjourned from 05.07.2023 to 12.07.2023, and again
from 12.07.2023 to 17.07.2023. Subsequently,
adjourned to 28.07.2023. On 28.07.2023, the case ... reach for the hearing in the list. Therefore, it was
automatically adjourned to 24.08.2023.
2. On 24.08.2023, the learned Counsel for the
Revision Petitioner
bona fide. Accordingly, the case was
adjourned from 05.07.2023 to 12.07.2023, and again
from 12.07.2023 to 17.07.2023. Subsequently,
adjourned to 28.07.2023. On 28.07.2023, the case ... reach for the hearing in the list. Therefore, it was
automatically adjourned to 24.08.2023.
2. On 24.08.2023, the learned Counsel for the
Revision Petitioner
grievance of the petitioner is that every time it is automatically
adjourned to different dates.
3. Considering the above said facts, the Family Court, Madurai
posted to a particular date, they are automatically adjourned to a further date even without the cases being called in open court and dates being
case was still further adjourned for hearing to 24-1-1952. On that date the plaintiff did not appear and his counsel reported no instructions ... that without any proceedings being gone through, the suit was automatically adjourned though two documents were filed and no witnesses had been examined
