Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

bills , then the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred.'        In the present case the dispute has its origin

from the civil court unless it is barred by any stature would not be treated as barred by the civil court. A Full Bench ... pecuniary jurisdiction, unless their cognizance is expressly or by necessary implication barred. Such suit would not be maintainable. It is true that ordinarily, the Civil

fact arising in regard to that liability, it may, by necessary implication, bar the maintainability of a civil suit in respect of the said liability ... said machinery to decide finally a jurisdictional fact thereby excluding by necessary implication the Patna High Court CWJC No.7777 of 2012 38/41 jurisdiction

Code of Criminal Procedure (1898) which, expressly or by necessary implication barred the right of the police to further investigate after cognizance of the case

such person preferring the appeal. (2)..... (3)....." xxxx "93. Bar of jurisdiction of courts, etc. - No court or other authority shall have ... registration or refusal to registration. Section 93 neither specifically nor by implication bars the jurisdiction of a civil court to injunct a person from applying

bills, then the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred. Section 7B of the Telegraph Act reads as under   S. 7B Arbitration

same is barred under a statute either expressly or by necessary implication. Bar of jurisdiction of a civil court is not to be readily inferred ... court in respect of all other matters relating to a company is barred. The corollary is that, unless a particular matter is specified

there,  unless   the   statute   contains   words   which  expressly   or   by   necessary   implication   exclude  the common law remedy, the party suing has his  election to pursue ... enforcement  of  a   particular  right  is  expressly   or   by   necessary   implication   barred,   the  people have a right to insist upon free access to the  Courts

nature excepting those the cognizance whereof is expressly or by necessary implication barred. Order VII Rule 11 (d) is one such provision which provides

provision in the Criminal Procedure Code which expressly or by necessary implication bars the right of the police to further investigate after cognizance has been