Rules and Regulations in the form of Memorandum and Rules and Regulations, which we have considered in the earlier portion of the judgment. That Rules ... such circumstances, the application of Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations of BCCI cannot be pressed into service. Therefore, the contention that clause
reason
19
that it is not a website of BCCI and BCCI cannot be found fault with the
action of wikipedia. Mr.Yadunandan Bansal, learned ... BCCI cannot be made accountable for the website of ICC.
18. Mr.R.Raman, learned Senior Counsel for the BCCI/second
respondent submitted that BCCI
defendant in terms of Clause 38(II) of the rules and regulations framed for the BCCI. A further prayer for suspending the second defendant ... their own Rules, and stay within the limits imposed by those Rules. If the Body vested with the power under the Rules, exercise that power
retaining the respondents 5 and 7, which is against the
Rule of BCCI and TNCA. In this regard, the petitioner has given a
complaint before
filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code, and consequently rejecting the plaint ... recognised as the Full Member of BCCI under Bye-law 3(a)(ii) of BCCI Memorandum and Rules and Regulations. The 2nd respondent prayed
right to have any cause of action against
BCCI. It was denied that the action of BCCI was to protect foreign monopoly
business of parties ... behalf of the first respondent /BCCI by the second respondent was just,
correct and in accordance with settled rules and made with bonafide intention
consider the role and the nature of functions being discharged by
the BCCI. This Court held that the Boards control over the sport of
cricket ... majority of 3:2 this Court ruled that respondent-BCCI
was not ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12. This Court held
that the Board
actually scored 141 runs only.
30.The question whether the respondent BCCI is
“State” within the meaning of Article 12 fell directly for
consideration ... majority, of 3:2 this Court ruled
that respondent BCCI was not “State” within the meaning of
Article 12. This Court held that the Board
M.R.Saravanan @ Cine Saravanan vs The Joint Secretary on 31 July, 2019
Bench: S
already held that merely
because BCCI is registered under the Societies Registration Act , does not bring
BCCI under the purview of Right to Information ... statutory
provisions, but also the statutory rules. This is clearly impermissible, by
holding that the entire Rules framed by the Commission not only with regard
