Partap Begar vs Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd on 20 July, 2022
Author: Rekha Borana
Bench: Rekha Borana
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ... JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2526/2019
Ram Partap Begar S/o Shri Surya Ram, Aged About 41 Years,
B/c Meghwa
emoluments paid for those extra 10 months of work, would amount to begar, which is prohibited under Article 23 of the Constitution. A Division Bench ... Article 23 of the Constitution of India prohibits taking of ''Begar'. The State-respondents having taken work from the appellant (Sushil Kumar
Adhikary's
service in the School cannot be equated with 'begar'
and any similar form of forced labour as she was
also ... conspirator along with others in stealing the
service of the petitioner. 'Begar' connotes forced
worked of any person or persons without any
remuneration
Ms Saraswathi G J vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 July, 2022
Author: M
said period then said non-
payment of salary will amount to taking Begar from petitioner and said is
prohibited by Article 23 of the Constitution ... period during which petitioner has worked, otherwise
same will amount to be begar.
Article 23 of the Constitution of India is quoted as under
Constitution outlaws untouchability ( Article 17 ), human
- 40 -
trafficking and begar ( Article 23 ), child employment
( Article 24 ). Part IV enacts Directive Principles of State
Policy which
Pallavi Kumari @ Pallavi Pandey, vs The State Of Bihar on 29 November, 2022
IN THE
Kumari Suman Patel @ Suman Patel vs The State Of Bihar on 29 November, 2022
IN
Annexure -P/2 issued by Respondent No.3 is document of
practicing Begar and forfeits pay from 04.03.2003 therefore,
writ of mandamus may kindly
human beings and
forced labour.--
(1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms
of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention
