Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Dr Swamy Manjunath S T vs State Of Karnataka on 21 December, 2018 Author: Krishna

scale admissible to the said post. This view accords with doctrine against begar enacted in 1 AIR 1998 SC 3164 2 MANU/KA/8640/2019 ... India. H.M.Seervai,4 a jurist of yester decades explains 'begar', as under: "The word 'begar' has not been

Ms. Bushra Abdul Aleem vs Government Of Karnataka on 30 August, 2019 Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE

Article 23(1) of the Constitution of India which prohibits 'begar'. The said Article reads as under: "23(1) Traffic in human ... beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance

contra action, if any, would be hit by doctrine of begar enacted under Article 23 of the Constitution of India ie., taking the services without

H.M. Kotresh vs Bangalore Electriciy Supply Company on 31 August, 2020 Author: Krishna S

Sri K B Lokesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 May, 2024 Author: Krishna

said period; Article 23 of the Constitution of India proscribes begar i.e., extraction of labour sans wages; the Apex Court interpreting this Article

Jail Sentence to the reasonable wages observing that non payment amounts to begar prohibited by Article 23 of the Constitution. : 10 : 11. The Circular dated

contra action, if any, would be hit by doctrine of begar enacted under Article 23 of the Constitution of India i.e., taking the services