Devidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 14 May, 2015
Equivalent citations
Page 2211 facts and what is shown in the film is really blasphemy. He submitted that in several countries the film has been banned ... event, Article 19(1)(a) cannot be invoked to protect blasphemy.
12. The relevant provisions of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 are extracted hereunder
fiction
around facts and what is shown in the film is really blasphemy. He submitted
that in several countries the film has been banned ... event,
Article 19(1)(a) cannot be invoked to protect blasphemy.
12. The relevant provisions of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 are
extracted hereunder
minds of many persons partake of the character of sacrilege of blasphemy. Such are the actions constituting the objectionable performance leading to law and order ... beliefs of that class.
39. The meaning of the word 'blasphemy' has been given in the New Webster's Dictionary of English
Devidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar vs State Of Maharashtra . on 14 May, 2015
Author: Dipak Misra
Bench
Muslim community of the world over, is blasphemour. He has committed a blasphemy by abusing the holy Prophet of Islam and his family ... abusing the holy Prophet and his family has become a man of blasphemy. He has committed a blasphemy. He has not regretted his action. Such
Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022
Author: M. M
Popular Front of India (PFI),
decided to avenge this purported act of blasphemy. On 04.07.2010 at
about 8AM, a group of people with a common
The State Of West Bengal vs Anwar Ali Sarkar on 11 January, 1952
Equivalent citations
State Of Punjab And Anr vs Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. And Anr on 20 November