sheet
provided to the applicant, he was subjected to bubble set
'C' in the question paper but inadvertently, he bubbled ... instead of 'C' while bubbling the OMR sheet. However, he
has transcribed according to question paper set 'C' in the
relevant
sheet as the applicant filled his Control No.
109565 while darkening the bubbles at the given space instead of
1095655. For this omission/commission ... result processing
which was done by matching scanned OMR data [darkened
bubbles] with original base records (as captured during the time
of application/admit card
office, it had to be
rejected, as he had not bubbled the columns 13 (1) B.A. (Hon.) in MIL
concerned (2) B.A. with ... 2015
was correct, as the candidate had not bubbled the requisite/important
columns meant for the Post Code 14/13, and as the applicant
three applicants of this OA had been rejected, as they had
not bubbled the requisite bubbles as indicated in the reasons column
against their names ... Application
Candidates Form No.
1. Devender 132674 Candidate had not bubbled
Yadav elective subject as provided in
Column No. 13 under TGT
2. Rajesh
given on the reverse of the OMR
sheet particularly with respect to bubbling of the OMR sheet which the
machine could not have evaluated automatically ... marked/
(Applicant No.3) sheet filled up wrong/
incorrect roll no. in
bubbles in the OMR
sheet. Thus his answer
sheet should not have
been
informed that the applicant‟s candidature has been "rejected for
wrong bubbling" in the OMR sheet in the roll number column ... outset has raised doubts
on her rejection, on the ground of wrong bubbling by stating
that, as per respondent Board‟s policy and stand
evaluation process. However, it appears that due to this minor discrepancy in
bubbling the Roll Number, the applicant's OMR sheet was not evaluated ... dated 10.08.2017. It was held therein that a bona fide mistake in
bubbling, where the roll number has been correctly written and the discrepancy
brought
overlooked during evaluation.
However it seems due to the minor error in bubbling the roll no, applicant's
OMR sheet has not been evaluated ... dated 10.08.2017. It was held therein that a bona fide mistake in
bubbling, where the roll number has been correctly written and the discrepancy
brought
overlooked during evaluation.
However it seems due to the minor error in bubbling the roll no, applicant's
OMR sheet has not been evaluated ... dated 10.08.2017. It was held therein that a bona fide mistake in
bubbling, where the roll number has been correctly written and the discrepancy
brought
were issued to the applicants alleging use of
whitener, overwriting, or wrong bubbling of roll/registration
numbers. The applicants explained that such minor clerical
lapses ... held that inconsequential mistakes
No. 25206/2016,
in roll number or bubbling cannot justify disqualification.
19
Item No. 39 (C-4) O.A. No. 1671
