Section 32 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
cause of the wreck of a ship. A protest made by the Captain, whose attendance cannot be procured, is a relevant fact. (i) The question
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19805 (1.36 seconds)Section 2 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
seaman or other members of the crew of a ship, (b) a captain or other member of the crew of an aircraft, (c) a person
Section 21 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
statement by himself that the deed is forged. (b) A, the captain of a ship, is tried for casting her away. Evidence is given
British India General Insurance Co., ... vs Captain Itbar Singh And Others on 11 May, 1959
British India General Insurance Co., ... vs Captain Itbar Singh And Others on 11 May, 1959
Equivalent citations: AIR 1959 SUPREME COURT ... PETITIONER:
BRITISH INDIA GENERAL INSURANCE CO., LTD.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
CAPTAIN ITBAR SINGH AND OTHERS
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
11/05/1959
BENCH:
ACT:
Motor Car lnsurance
Captain Ramesh Chander Kaushal vs Mrs. Veena Kaushal And Ors. on 22 August, 1978
Captain Ramesh Chander Kaushal vs Mrs. Veena Kaushal And Ors. on 22 August, 1978
Equivalent citations: AIR1978SC1807, 1979CRILJ3, (1978)4SCC71, [1978]3SCR782
Bench
The State vs Captain Jagjit Singh on 14 September, 1961
State vs Captain Jagjit Singh on 14 September, 1961
Equivalent citations: 1962 AIR 253, 1962 SCR (3) 622, AIR 1962 SUPREME COURT 253, 1962 ALLCRIR ... Gupta , J.C. Shah
PETITIONER:
THE STATE
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
CAPTAIN JAGJIT SINGH
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
14/09/1961
BENCH:
WANCHOO, K.N.
BENCH:
WANCHOO
State Of Maharashtra vs Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao on 29 September, 1989
State Of Maharashtra vs Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao on 29 September, 1989
Equivalent citations: 1989 AIR 2292, 1989 SCR SUPL. (1) 315, AIR 1989 SUPREME ... Ahmadi , K.N. Saikia
PETITIONER:
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
CAPTAIN BUDDHIKOTA SUBHA RAO
DATE OF JUDGMENT29/09/1989
BENCH:
AHMADI
Lt. Col. Prithi Pal Singh Bedi Etc vs Union Of India & Others on 25 August, 1982
less than four are of
the rank not below that of a Captain and (ii) that members
of court martial for trial of an officer ... corps nor was any of
them lower in rank than a Captain. Therefore. there was
nothing to show that rule 40 had been violated
Captain Harish Uppal vs Union Of India And Others on 27 November, 1972
Captain Harish Uppal vs Union Of India And Others on 27 November, 1972
Equivalent citations: 1973 AIR 258, 1973 SCR (2)1025
Author: A. Alagiriswami ... Bench: A. Alagiriswami
PETITIONER:
CAPTAIN HARISH UPPAL
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
DATE OF JUDGMENT27/11/1972
BENCH:
ALAGIRISWAMI, A.
BENCH:
ALAGIRISWAMI
Section 81 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
knowledge that it was likely to cause harm. Illustrations (a) A, the captain of a steam vessel, suddenly and without any fault or negligence