Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.76 seconds)

Ghedia Harischandra Chimanlal vs Govt. Of Gujarat on 5 April, 2016

absorbees who had commuted 100% of their   pension were not extended CGHS facility, as they were not availing CGHS   facility at the time of their ... Central Administrative   Tribunal, Chennai, requesting for the extension of CGHS facility to him.   CAT,   Chennai   Bench,   vide   its   order   dated   the   15th  September,   2005,   ordered
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

Chanrakant Kantilal Dave vs State Of Gujarat Through Chief ... on 18 September, 2018

Scheme will receive  reimbursement   only   at   the   rate   approved   by   the  CGHS,   regardless   of   the   fact   that   in   his  particular   town   or   city   there ... also  submitted   that   the   approved   rates   are   not  updated   by   the   CGHS   from   time   to   time   so   that  what   the   beneficiary   receives
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - A S Supehia - Full Document

Superintendent Of Post Offices vs Mohammad Janumiya Sindhi on 19 July, 2016

month   or   in   the  alternative,   to   become   Central   Government  Health   Scheme   (CGHS)   beneficiary   and   avail  the   said   CGHS   facility,   for   which   case   he  could   avail ... allowance   of  Rs.300/­ per month and did not opt to become  CGHS   beneficiary,   though   repeatedly   asked,  and,   therefore,  the   original   applicant­ employee shall
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next