order dated 31.08.2009
passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF) for NDPL
on a complaint filed by the respondent No.1/Consumer for refund ... Consumer filed a complaint case before the Consumer Grievance
Redressal Forum (CGRF) praying inter alia for refund of the excess
amount
order dated 31st August, 2009 of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum
(CGRF) holding the complaint preferred by the appellant to CGRF to be not
barred ... limitation.
2. The appellant had approached the CGRF in the year 2009 with the
complaint that the appellant had on 27th July, 1992 approached
connection was not changed.
Plaintiff remained unsatisfied with the decision of the CGRF.
That a bill dated 20.12.2012 was received from the defendant ... that suit is time barred. Plaintiff has already got the relief
from CGRF. There is no proper verification to the plaint. The
suit is barred
ORDER DATED 27.6.2012 IN OP NO. 13/2012-13 OF THE
CGRF, KOZHIKODE.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED ... before the
Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Kozhikode (herein
after referred as "CGRF"). The CGRF had disposed the
matter through Ext.P7, holding
apprised about the reason for non
compliance of order passed by CGRF, in case titled as "Jamna
Devi vs. TPDDL" and the same ... completion of commercial / technical formalities and as
against the defendant by CGRF, which admittedly is beyond the
period of three years as prescribed under Limitation
billing disputes, which should first go to the
Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum (CGRF) and thereafter
to the Ombudsman established under Section
Regulations applicable
w.e.f. 01.01.2015. Therefore, the decision dated 12.08.2016
of CGRF taken in appeal Case No: CG-71 of 2016 is held
good
whom representation is
made the consumer may approach Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum
(CGRF) framed under section 42(5) of the Act.
9.34 The licensee
