informant has stated that somewhere in March 2021 there was
forcible circumcision (Khatana). It was impressed upon the
informant that after the circumcision ... told to him that he has been brought
there for circumcision and if he speaks anything then he would
be defamed by making his video
informant has stated that somewhere in March 2021 there was
forcible circumcision (Khatana). It was impressed upon the
informant that after the circumcision ... told to him that he has been brought
there for circumcision and if he speaks anything then he would
be defamed by making his video
much as the deceased was a Hindu whereas he had undergone circumcision according to the evidence of the petitioner. The very fact that ... body of the brother of the petitioner who had admittedly undergone circumcision. When respondent No.3 had conducted the post-mortem on the said body
negatives the possibiloity of recent complete
penetration. If the accused is not circumcised, the existence of
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013
negatives the possibility of recent
complete penetration. If the accused is
not circumcised, the existence of
smegma round the corona gland is proof
against penetration
authority of the Authority and Adjudicating Offcer is not in any
manner circumcised or barred as a consequence of non
registration of a Real Estate
The State Of Maharashtra vs Santosh Vishnu Lonkar And Others on 17 October, 2019
Equivalent
Bhagwat Parbati Kshirsagar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 11 January, 2018
Bench: S. S
The State Of Maharashtra vs Bhagwat S/O Parbati Kshirsagar And Anr on 11 January
Santosh Vishnu Lonkar And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra on 17 October, 2019
Author
