Search Results Page

Search Results

31 - 40 of 90 (1.04 seconds)
Documents citing Vinay Varma vs Kanika Pasricha & Anr. on 29 November, 2019

Jyoti Sharma vs Suresh Chandra Sharma And Ors on 21 September, 2024

23. I have gone through the impugned order dated 17.02.2022. It is observed by the Ld. Trial Court that the complainant is having cordial relations with her husband i.e. respondent no. 4 and she is not claiming any relief against the respondent no. 4. Ld. Trial Court relied upon the judgments of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the cases of Aarti Sharma Vs. Ganga Saran and Vinay Verma Vs. Kanika Pasricha and held that the complainant, who is the daughter-in-law of respondent no. 2 and 3 cannot be permitted to misuse her right provided under the act to take possession of the property belonging to the respondents.
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Munni Devi vs Ajay @ Amit And Anr on 6 November, 2024

56. It is also well settled law that the husband has the primary responsibility to provide for the maintenance of his wife. Thus, to balance the rights of both the plaintiff and the defendant no. 2, and keeping in view the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Vinay (Supra), an alternate accommodation should be arranged for the defendant no. 2 by her husband i.e defendant no.1.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Roop Misra And Anr vs Nidhi Misra on 19 April, 2025

78. At this juncture it is also pertinent to refer to the judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Vinay Varma v. Kanika Pasricha & Another 2019 SCC Online Del 11530, wherein the issue was regarding the interpretation and balance between The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in this case laid down guidelines for striking a balance between the two Acts, while observing as follows "However, later decisions of various High Courts have, while giving divergent opinions on the concept of `shared household‟, followed one uniform pattern in order to protect the daughter in-law and to provide for a dignified roof/shelter for her. The question then arises as to whether the obligation of providing the shelter or roof is upon the in-laws or upon the husband of the daughter-in-law i.e., the son. Some broad guidelines as set out Digitally signed by ANUBHAV ANUBHAV SHARMA SHARMA Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pooja Mehta & Ors vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 27 May, 2025

15. Countering the arguments made on behalf of the appellants, Mr. Vivek Chib, learned Senior Advocate representing the respondent no.2, has argued that the appellant no.1 has connived with her husband (son of respondent no.2) in an attempt to take shelter of the proceedings under the DV Act. He has stated that though the respondent no.3 (husband of the appellant no.1) had challenged the order passed by the DM by filing appeal before the Divisional Commissioner/Appellate Authority and had also filed the writ petition before the learned Single Judge, but has not filed any intra-court appeal against the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Drawing our attention to a judgment of this Court Vinay Verma v. Kanika Pasricha, 2019 SCC Online Delhi 11530, it has been stated by Mr.Chib that striking a balance between the rights under the DV Act and the Senior Citizens Act, certain guidelines have been issued therein and the said guidelines have further been followed in various other cases, such as in the case of Ambika Jain v. Ram Prakash Sharma & Anr., 2019 SCC Online Delhi 11886.
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - T R Gedela - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3 4   5 6 7 8 9 Next