Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.94 seconds)

Lala Ram Sarup Kasera Trust vs Union Of India on 15 September, 2023

This court is also of the view that the circle rates cannot be taken as the basis for assessment of market value in the present case and is thus relying upon the judgments passed in case titled Chandra Pratap Singh Vs. UOI & Anr. which pertains to the award No.2/07-08 wherein the market value has been enhanced to Rs.48,000/- per sq. mts. as on the date of notification U/s 4 of the LA Act in the said case i.e. 12.4.2006. Since the said market value was determined on the basis of L&DO rates relied upon by the LAC himself, there is no reason why the said rates cannot be relied by this court, more specifically when the location and potentiality of the properties acquired vide the present award is similar to that of award no.2/07-08, Jhilmil Tahirpur.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Goel vs Union Of India Ans on 28 September, 2024

48. Ex.PW1/11 is the copy of award 4/2009-10 pertaining to village Aaya Nagar, Delhi. Document Ex.PW1/12 is a judgment in LAC No. 1/2009 titled as Chandra Pratap Singh Vs UOI & Ors. dated 24.05.2014 pronounced by Ld. ADJ-01, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. As per award, the LAC assessed the market price of the acquired land @ 17,58,400/- per acre. However, LAC while passing the present award determined the market value @ Rs.53,00,000/- per acre which is at much higher rate than award Ex.PW1/11.
Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Goel vs Union Of India Ans on 28 September, 2024

49. Ex.PW1/11 is the copy of award 4/2009-10 pertaining to village Aaya Nagar, Delhi. Document Ex.PW1/12 is a judgment in LAC No. 1/2009 titled as Chandra Pratap Singh Vs UOI & Ors. dated 24.05.2014 pronounced by Ld. ADJ-01, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. As per award, the LAC assessed the market price of the acquired land @ 17,58,400/- per acre. However, LAC while passing the present award determined the market value @ Rs.53,00,000/- per acre which is at much higher rate than award Ex.PW1/11.
Delhi District Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Raj Kumari Sharma (Deceased) vs Union Of India on 18 July, 2023

This court is also of the view that the circle rates cannot be taken as the basis for assessment of market value in the present case and is thus relying upon the judgments passed in case titled Chandra Pratap Singh Vs. UOI & Anr. which pertains to the award No.2/07-08 wherein the market value has been enhanced to Rs.48,000/- per sq. mts. as on the date of notification U/s 4 of the LA Act in the said case i.e. 12.04.2006. Since the said market value was determined on the basis of L&DO rates relied upon by the LAC himself, there is no reason why the said rates cannot be relied by this court, more specifically when the location and potentiality of the properties LAC No. 6/2023 Page no. 13/16 acquired vide the present award is similar to that of award no.2/07-08, Jhilmil Tahirpur.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Goyal vs Union Of India Ans on 28 September, 2024

50. Ex.PW1/11 is the copy of award 4/2009-10 pertaining to village Aaya Nagar, Delhi. Document Ex.PW1/12 is a judgment in LAC No. 1/2009 titled as Chandra Pratap Singh Vs UOI & Ors. dated 24.05.2014 pronounced by Ld. ADJ-01, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. As per award, the LAC assessed the market price of the acquired land @ 17,58,400/- per acre. However, LAC while passing the present award determined the market value @ Rs.53,00,000/- per acre which is at much higher rate than award Ex.PW1/11. Ex.PW1/12 cannot be relied upon in the present case as the same is concerned with different district i.e. village Jhilmil Tahirpur, Delhi and the land was acquired for construction of Shahdara-Dilshad Garden Corridor of Delhi MRTS Project Phase II at GT Road, Shahdara.
Delhi District Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Ram Kishan Singhal vs Union Of India on 20 September, 2022

10 In earlier proceedings the petitioner tendered in his evidence the certified copies of the entire evidence of the previous LAC case no. 1/2009, titled as Chandra Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India relating to award no.2/2007-2008 wherein the date of notification under section 4 of the LA Act in the said award was 12.04.2006. The same was exhibited as Ex.PW1/1 (colly.) and the copy of the judgment dated 24.05.2014 was exhibited as Ex.PW1/2.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Old Address: J-34A vs Union Of India on 24 September, 2022

10 In earlier proceedings the petitioner tendered in his evidence the certified copies of the entire evidence of the previous LAC case no. 1/2009, titled as Chandra Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India relating to award no.2/2007-2008 wherein the date of notification under section 4 of the LA Act in the said award was 12.04.2006. The same was exhibited as Ex.PW1/3 (colly.) and the copy of the judgment dated 24.05.2014 was exhibited as Ex.PW1/4.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1