Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1481 (0.07 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Nagaland vs Lipok Ao & Ors on 1 April, 2005

Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Binod Kumar Maheswari & Ors on 9 February, 2024

It was rendered at a point of time when the decisions in Katiji [Collector (LA) v. Katiji, (1987) 2 SCC 107] , Ramegowda [G. Ramegowda v. LAO, (1988) 2 SCC 142] , Chandra Mani [State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani, (1996) 3 SCC 132] , K.V. Ayisumma [Tehsildar (LA) v. K.V. Ayisumma, (1996) 10 SCC 634] and Lipok AO [State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao, (2005) 3 SCC 752 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 906] were holding the field. It is not that the said decisions do not hold the field now, having been overruled by any subsequent decision.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others vs Of on 6 May, 2016

In dealing with the applications for condonation of delay filed on behalf of the State and its agencies/instrumentalities this Court has, while emphasizing that same yardstick should be applied for deciding the applications for condonation of delay filed by private individuals and the State, observed that certain amount of latitude is not impermissible in the latter case because the State represents collective cause of the community and the decisions are taken by the officers/agencies at a slow pace and encumbered process of pushing the files from table to table consumes considerable time causing delay - G. Ramegowda v. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer (1988) 2 SCC 142, State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani (1996) 3 SCC 132, State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra (1996) 9 SCC 309, State of Bihar v. Ratan Lal Sahu (1996) 10 SCC 635, State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao (2005) 3 SCC 752, and State (NCT of Delhi) v. Ahmed Jaan (2008) 14 SCC 582.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Shivamma (Dead) By Lrs vs Karnataka Housing Board on 12 September, 2025

211. The earlier decisions of this Court, particularly in K.V. Ayisumma (supra), Chandra Mani (supra), Lipok AO (supra) and Indian Oil Corpn (supra) insofar as they favoured a liberal approach towards the State or any of its instrumentality in matters of condonation of delay, and showed indulgence Special Leave Petition (C) No. 10704 of 2019 Page 140 of 170 in condoning the same on ground of impersonal and slow-moving nature of these entities, no longer reflects the correct position in law. No litigant, be it a private party or a State or any of its functionaries, is entitled to a broader margin of error, falling in the category of inaction, negligence or casualness, in matters of limitation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Delhi Development Authority vs Sudip Kumar Lahiri on 26 October, 2015

(xii) In Union of India Vs. Mahender Singh (supra), the delay was condoned in view of the authorities titled as G. Ramegowda, Major & Ors. Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Banglore, State of Haryana Vs. Chandra Mani and State of Nagaland Vs. Lipok AO and Ors. wherein it has been held that certain amount of latitude within reasonable limits was not impermissible having regard to impersonal bureaucratic setup.
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

G.Babu vs The State on 6 June, 2017

4. As held by this Court in State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao and Ors. MANU/SC/0250/2005 : (2005) 3 SCC 752, the court must always take a justice-oriented approach while considering an application for condonation of delay. If the court is convinced that there had been an attempt on the part of the government officials or public servants to defeat justice by causing delay, the court, in view of the larger public interest, should take a lenient view in such situations, condone the delay, howsoever huge may be the delay, and have the matter decided on merits.
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - K K Sasidharan - Full Document

M/S Uttarakhand Power Corporation ... vs M/S Uttar Bharat Hydro Power Pvt. Ltd & ... on 24 July, 2020

(Emphasis supplied) 7.20 Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the law laid down by the Apex Court and this Court in host of judgments, the instant application filed by the applicant/appellant is liable to succeed by condoning the delay in filing the Appeal in the interest of justice and equity. The fact that it was the UPCL which was seeking condonation and not a private party was altogether irrelevant. The doctrine of equality before law demands that all litigants, including the State as a litigant, are accorded the same treatment and the law is administered in an even-handed manner. There is no warrant for according a step-motherly treatment when the State is the Applicant/Appellant. The balance of convenience lies in favour of the Applicant/Appellant as if the delay is not condoned, the consumer will unnecessarily be burdened. Hence, we are of the considered view that it will be in the interest of justice and equity that the delay be condoned. The Appellant/Applicant hereby declines that nothing material has been concealed or suppressed.
Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bank Of India vs Chotanagpur Graphite Industries And ... on 23 August, 2006

15. The decisions referred to and discussed above, to my mind, unmistakably lean in favour of condonation of the delay the petitioner has prayed for. The decisions referred to and relied upon by the respondent do not apply. However, much the opposite party-respondents try to find loopholes in the whole period of the delay, the applicant-Bank has successfully plugged them to show that the so-called lapses were in no way deliberate or intentional but only a part of the usually time-consuming and routine administrative process the movements of files in the Banking, for that matter, Government departments, entail. So, a liberal approach has to be taken in the matter of condonation of delay in terms of the guidelines of the Supreme Court in State of Nagaland v. Lipok A.O. (supra), as cited above.
Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next