Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.51 seconds)

M/S. Mitra S.P. P Ltd., vs Dhiren Kumar on 22 March, 2022

5. In the course of hearing, the issue that had fallen for consideration was about the maintainability of the writ appeals. Referring to various judgments of Hon'ble the Supreme Court and different High Courts in State of Maharashtra v. Labour Law Practitioners' Assn. 1 , Management of Hindustan Times Ltd. v. Aita Ram 2 , Shailendra Kumar v. Divisional Forest Officer3, Gurushanth Pattedar v. Mahaboob Shahi Kulburga Mills and another 4, Caparo Engineering India Ltd. v. Ummed Singh Lodhi and another (Civil Appeal Nos.5829-5830 of 2021), Vishnu Ganapathi Naik v. The Management of NWKRTC 5 and Ghanshyam Sharma v. Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation6, Mr. N. Ashwani Kumar, learned counsel for the workman, argued that the award passed by the Labour Court being essentially an adjudication of a civil dispute by a judicial forum, the learned single Judge could have exercised power only under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and that being so, writ appeals are not maintainable against an order passed in exercise of powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - P K Mishra - Full Document

D.T.C. vs Phool Singh & Anr. on 17 August, 2022

"23. Ghanshyam Sharma v Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, [(2000) 33 LLJ 588 Raj.] was again a case where conductor was held guilty of misconduct of carrying passenger without ticket. On a reference being made, the Labour Court invoked its jurisdiction under Section 11(A) and while upholding the finding that the respondent was guilty of misconduct, it directed the respondent's reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages. The learned Single Judge set aside the award which decision was reversed by the Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lochan Singh vs Haryana Roadways on 24 October, 2016

23. Ghanshyam Sharma v Regional Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, [(2000) 33 LLJ 588 Raj.] was again a case where conductor was held guilty of misconduct of carrying passenger without ticket. On a reference being made, the Labour Court invoked its jurisdiction under Section 11(A) and while upholding the finding that the respondent was guilty of misconduct, it directed the respondent's reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages. The learned Single Judge set aside the award which decision was reversed by the Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - S Gupta - Full Document
1