Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Varghese K. Joseph vs The Custodian & Ors on 31 January, 2011

Samir Sett vs The Custodian on 12 July, 2019

In the case of Varghese K. Joseph vs. The Custodian and Ors. the Supreme Court was concerned with a statutory appeal under Section 10 11/13 spma-15-2019 challenging summary rejection of an application for certification of shares received after the cut off date of 27 th August, 2005. The question which the Supreme Court considered whether the Special Court was right in rejecting an investor's application on the ground of delay and as being beyond cut off date. That case concerned 100 equity shares of RIL. That applicant approached the company which informed the applicant that the shares were tainted. An application was made for certification in 2005. The last date for certification was 27th June, 2005 whereas he has approached the Court on 27th August, 2005 i.e. after cut off date. He was not aware of the cut off date on 27th August, 2005. The Court observed that the application was beyond time. The Court considered the various aspects. The fact that the public notice has been issued in 32 daily publication providing 60 days to approach the Custodian for certification. The applicant in that case was abroad for large part of the time and submitted that the cut-off date could not be of statutory nature.
Bombay High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A K Menon - Full Document

Akhilesh Grover vs State Of Punjab And Others on 20 September, 2011

Learned counsel for the appellant has vehemently argued that the appellant is an eligible candidate and, therefore, he is entitled to appear in the main examination, as he has submitted his application form through speed post well before the last date i.e. 08.02.2011. Reliance is placed upon Varghese K. Joseph Vs. Custodian and others (2011) 3 SCC 394, in which the Custodian had fixed the cut off date to perform the duty of certification and the Hon'ble Supreme Court found that such cut off date by the Custodian is oblivious of its consequences and other ramification on the investors and that the investors could not be denied dues on the ground of delay in filing the application for certification.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - H Gupta - Full Document

Raj Rattan vs The Custodian on 14 February, 2020

2. It appears that the applicant claims to be educated in vernacular language and was engaged in selling utensils in a small town of Haryana. He was unaware of the factual background and the bar of transfer. He has, therefore, approached the court belatedly. Reliance is placed upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Varghese K. Joseph Vs. The Custodian & Ors.1. The learned counsel for the applicant, therefore, requests that the aforesaid facts may be considered.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Menon - Full Document
1