Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)

Amit Gopinathan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 September, 2021

This Court is afraid that appellant cannot be helped. The petition in question has been dismissed by relying upon Single Bench decision which dismissed a similar case at the principal seat at Jabalpur in WP.11977/2021 and WP.11356/2021 but the said issue has earlier been decided by the co-ordinate Bench in WP.1673/2016 [Himanshi Deshmukh & Anr. Vs. State of M.P. & Ors.] and in Bindu Patel Vs. State of M.P. and another [2010 (4) MPLJ 231] and also by the Apex Court in Union of India & Others Vs. Shivbachan Rai [(2001) 9 SCC 356]".
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Nagu - Full Document

Jitendra Singh Bhadoria vs State Of M.P. on 3 February, 2022

Even otherwise in the light of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Sushma Suri Vs. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi and another reported in [(1999) 1 SCC 330] and by Division Bench of this Court in the case of Bindu Patel Vs. State of M.P. And Another reported in [2010(4) MPLJ 231], reliefs sought for also cannot be countenanced in the matter of relaxation.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R Arya - Full Document

Jitendra Singh Bhadoria vs State Of M.P. on 3 February, 2022

Even otherwise in the light of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Sushma Suri Vs. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi and another reported in [(1999) 1 SCC 330] and by Division Bench of this Court in the case of Bindu Patel Vs. State of M.P. And Another reported in [2010(4) MPLJ 231], reliefs sought for also cannot be countenanced in the matter of relaxation.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R Arya - Full Document
1