citedby: 1066838

State vs . : Babu Lal on 14 December, 2011

In Roop Chand Vs. State of Haryana reported in 1990 (1) CLR 69, it has been held that such casual explanations that the public persons refused to join the proceedings are unreliable.

Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Baljeet Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 November, 2021

Ex.R9 Copy of policy for rehabilitation and resettlement of land owners Ex.R10 Copy of award dated 2.4.2011 passed by the Court of Shri S. K. Kaushik, the then learned ADJ, Palwal in case titled as 'Roop Chand and others Vs. State of Haryana and others' Ex.R11 Copy of award dated 25.8.2011 passed by the Court of Shri S. K. Kaushik, the then learned ADJ, Palwal in case titled as Shum Vs. State of Haryana and others' Ex.R12 Integrated sajzra plan of revenue estate of Village Patli Hazipur Ex.R18 Copy of sale deed No.97 dated 15.4.2005 vide which land measuring 31K-8M situated in Village Patli Hazipur was sold for ₹13,00,000/-

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 4 - A Kshetarpal - Full Document

Roop Chand vs State Of Haryana & Others on 11 July, 2013

This order shall dispose of CWP No. 12682 of 2012 titled as Roop Chand Vs. State of Haryana & others, CWP No. 11889 of 2012 titled as Shashi Prakash Vs. State of Haryana & others, CWP No. 12438 of 2012 titled as Inderjit Vs. State of Haryana and CWP No. 18963 of 2012 titled as Ramesh Vs. State of Haryana & others as identical issue is involved in these petitions. Facts, however, are being noticed from CWP No. 12682 of 2012.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 371 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

State vs . Chanda on 10 January, 2013

13 In this regard reliance may be placed on the following case laws: In case reported as Roop Chand vs. State of Haryana 1990 CCC 3, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that:

Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sandeep @ Terra on 14 January, 2013

In case titled as "Roop Chand Vs. State of Haryana" reported as CC Cases 3 (HC), it was held as that where the police has failed to join independent witnesses in the investigation despite their availability and further failed to take action against those who refused to take part in investigation nor their names were noted FIR No.66/2001 Page No. 6 of 11 down by the police, the explanation of the police for not joining independent witnesses is an afterthought and liable to be rejected.

Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Manoj Katyal on 15 January, 2013

14 In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, reliance may be placed on the following case laws: In case reported as Roop Chand vs. State of Haryana 1990 CCC 3, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that:

Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

3.Title :State vs . Ganga on 17 January, 2013

In ROOP CHAND VS. STATE OF HARYANA 1990 (1) CLR 69 it was observed that such explanations are unreliable.

Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Vikash on 14 January, 2013

14 In this regard reliance may be placed on the following case laws: State vs. Vikash, FIR No.525/07, PS Jahangirpuri Page no.6/10 In case reported as as ''Roop Chand vs. State of Haryana'', 1990 CCC 3, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that:

Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Dilip on 17 January, 2013

In a case law reported as "Roop Chand Vs. The State of Haryana", 1999(1) C.L.R 69, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court held as under:

Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sanjay on 11 January, 2013

In a case law reported as "Roop Chand Vs. The State of Haryana", 1999(1) C.L.R 69, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court held as under:

Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results