Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (2.04 seconds)

Mirza Faizan Beg vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 10 April, 2025

2. This application under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as BNSS) has been preferred against order dated 28.08.2024, passed by Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)/A.C.J.M., Court No.15, Deoria in Criminal Misc. Application No.1799 of 2024 (Mirza Faizan Beg Vs. Mirza Seraj Beg and Others), Police Station- Rudrapur, District- Deoria, whereby the application field by applicant under Section 175(3) BNSS has been registered as a complaint case. The order dated 11.02.2025, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Deoria in Criminal Revision No.124 of 2024 is also being impugned, whereby the revision against order dated 28.08.2024 has been dismissed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - R B Singh - Full Document

Mirza Ibrahim Beg vs State on 9 September, 2025

5. Statement of accused was recorded u/s 313 CrPC, wherein he denied the entire evidence. He claimed that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated to pressurize him to compromise the civil litigation in the suit titled Mirza Islam Beg Vs Mirza Ibrahim Beg. He wished to lead evidence in defence, but did not examine any witness in defence evidence and the case was fixed for final arguments.

Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Snehal Nishant Pagare vs Nishant Prabhakar Pagare on 6 March, 2019

6) Kalpna w/o Pankaj Rozatkar Vs. Pankaj Supadu Rozatka, [AIR 2013 Bombay 146], 7] Bismillah w/o Mirza Muzahid Beg Vs. Mirza Muzahid Beg Aman Beg, [2013 (8) LJSOFT 125], 8] Anita Balkrishna Barge Vs. Balkrishna Sopan Barge, [2011 (2) LJSOFT 106], 9] Sandhya w/o Ananta Mane Vs. Ananta s/o Manohar Mane, [2010 (5) LJSOFT (URC) 15], ::: Uploaded on - 11/03/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 14/03/2019 04:40:57 ::: 3 923-mca-51-19.odt 10] Shruti w/o Shriram Jangam Vs. Shriram s/o Balkrushn Jangam [2009 (9) LJSOFT 175], 11] Sangamitra w/o Ramakant Royalwar Vs. Ramakant s/o Gangaram Royalwar [2008 (12) LJSOFT 35].
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R V Ghuge - Full Document
1