Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.34 seconds)

Manojgiri Valamgiri Goswami vs State Of Gujarat - Through Deputy ... on 3 May, 2016

4.1 Adverting to look into and consider the decision relied on by learned advocate for review applicant, the first was an Apex Court's decision in Manohar Singh vs. Union of India being S. B. Civil Writ Petition NO. 1184 of 1994 decided on 7th January, 2014. The challenge laid in that petition before the Supreme Court by a Constable/Driver employed in Border Security Force (BSF) was against the impugned order dated 20th May 1993 (Exh.2) denoting confirmation of findings and sentence, passed by the Inspector General Kashmir FTR BSF, Commanding Officer, Srinagar, whereby the petitioner was handed down a sentence of five years' rigorous imprisonment and penalty of dismissal from service, and the appellate order dated 27th July 1994 passed by Director General, BSF, New Delhi upholding order.
Gujarat High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - N V Anjaria - Full Document

Dr. Shivram Meena S/O Shri Hariram Meena vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 November, 2021

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders impugned dated 12.08.2021 and 23.09.2021 have been passed by the learned Tribunal allowing the appeal as also the (Downloaded on 23/11/2021 at 09:45:21 PM) (2 of 2) [CW-12263/2021] review application filed by respondent No.3 without even issuing notice to the respondents including the present petitioner who was respondent No.3 therein. He submits that it is trite law that any order passed exparte without issuing notice to the respondents adversely affecting their rights, is void ab initio and deserves to be quashed and set aside. He, in support of his submissions relies upon a judgment of this Court dated 23.10.2021 passed in SBCWP No.8307/2021 Manohar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He, therefore, prays that the orders impugned in the writ petition be quashed and set aside and the matter be remanded back to the learned Tribunal for decision of the appeal afresh after affording all the respondents an opportunity of hearing.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M K Goyal - Full Document

Daljeet Singh @ Dal Singh vs Union Of India And Ors on 7 January, 2022

This Court, after perusal of the order sheet dated 21.01.2019 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1640/2015, it emanates that there was a prayer from counsel Mr. Sheetal Kumbhat that the SBCWP No.7710/2009 [Daljeet Singh Vs. Union of India] has to be reconstituted. There is also a direction from this Hon'ble Court in the same order-sheet to reconstitute the file. The photostat copy of the file is on record and it is before this Court today.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document

Union Of India And Anr vs State And Ors on 7 January, 2022

This Court, after perusal of the order sheet dated 21.01.2019 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1640/2015, it emanates that there was a prayer from counsel Mr. Sheetal Kumbhat that the SBCWP No.7710/2009 [Daljeet Singh Vs. Union of India] has to be reconstituted. There is also a direction from this Hon'ble Court in the same order-sheet to reconstitute the file. The photostat copy of the file is on record and it is before this Court today.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document
1