Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.55 seconds)
Documents citing Mukhtiyar Singh & Ors. vs Prem Chand & Ors. on 22 March, 2022

Poornima Sharma vs Vipul Gaur on 24 August, 2023

(i) CS (OS) 57/2022 [MISC. SCJ 279/2018] titled Pirthi Nath & Ors. v. Tula Ram in the Account No. Signature Not Verified FAO 36/2021 & connected matters Page 14 of 15 Digitally Signed By:DHIRENDER KUMAR Signing Date:31.08.2023 16:59:37 CCD843 PAO VI, SBI, Tis Hazari Courts, where pursuant to the orders of the Division Bench of this Court passed in 1972 & 1978, a sum of Rs.10 lacs is stated to be lying deposited in the said account.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. vs Kamlesh Sharma on 24 August, 2023

(i) CS (OS) 57/2022 [MISC. SCJ 279/2018] titled Pirthi Nath & Ors. v. Tula Ram in the Account No. Signature Not Verified FAO 36/2021 & connected matters Page 14 of 15 Digitally Signed By:DHIRENDER KUMAR Signing Date:31.08.2023 16:59:37 CCD843 PAO VI, SBI, Tis Hazari Courts, where pursuant to the orders of the Division Bench of this Court passed in 1972 & 1978, a sum of Rs.10 lacs is stated to be lying deposited in the said account.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Bishan Swaroop vs Mahender Kumar Pandey on 24 August, 2023

(i) CS (OS) 57/2022 [MISC. SCJ 279/2018] titled Pirthi Nath & Ors. v. Tula Ram in the Account No. Signature Not Verified FAO 36/2021 & connected matters Page 14 of 15 Digitally Signed By:DHIRENDER KUMAR Signing Date:31.08.2023 16:59:37 CCD843 PAO VI, SBI, Tis Hazari Courts, where pursuant to the orders of the Division Bench of this Court passed in 1972 & 1978, a sum of Rs.10 lacs is stated to be lying deposited in the said account.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. vs Kamlesh Sharma on 25 April, 2022

35. It is also noticed that the records of CS(OS) 57/2022 (Old M. No. 54/09) titled Prithi Nath & Ors. v. Tula Ram, are not complete. Vide previous order dated 1st February, 2022, the deposits were requisitioned by this Court from Account No. CCD843 PAO VI, SBI, Tis Hazari Courts. However, Mr. R.K. Bhardwaj, ld. Counsel, submits that in this case, where the deposits have been made since 1978, the same have still not been received. The worthy Registrar General is requested to direct the concerned Court to positively give a report in this case, along with the entire record by the next date of hearing, as to the amount deposited and the amount lying in the account in respect of this suit. The Branch Manager, SBI, Tis Hazari Courts Complex, where this amount is stated to have been deposited, shall remain present in the Court on the next date of hearing.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. vs Kamlesh Sharma on 6 October, 2023

Insofar as CS(OS) 56/2022 titled Shiv Narain Sharma & Anr. v. Kirpa Ram & Ors. is concerned, a cheque has also been received on 16th March, 2022 pursuant to the directions of ld. Administrator. The same has been converted into a FDR of Rs.4,93,496/- and is lying with the Original Branch of this Court. The said amount, which is lying in an FDR form, be also deposited in the Kalkaji Mandir Fund.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document
1