Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.01 seconds)
Documents citing M/S. Rhythm County vs Satish Sanjay Magade on 10 October, 2023

M/S Jai Girraj Stones vs Union Of India on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Jai Girraj Stones vs Union Of India on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Kapil Agarwal Through Its ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Deepraj Singh Through Its ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Devdashrath Royalties Private ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Devdashrath Royalties Private ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Deepraj Singh Through Its ... vs 1- Union Of India Through Secretary on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Devdashrath Royalties Private ... vs 1- Union Of India Through Secretary on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Devdashrath Royalties Private ... vs 1- Union Of India Through Secretary on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Shiv Shankar Stones Suppliers ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 8 May, 2026

51. If we examine in light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha: (2022) 13 SCC 401, and M/s Rhythm County case noted above, we found that the calculation method which has been initiated by the CPCB methodology finds support and further action has been initiated in accordance with this method. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that the adopting an applicability of the CPCB methodology does not depart the judicial function rather it evidences an exercise of informal discussion 80 where expert finding were gauged, filtered and integrated into a reasoned adjudicatory outcome. Such exercise is a technical assistance.
National Green Tribunal Cites 80 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next