Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 123 (2.46 seconds)
Documents citing Vinayak Road Carriers vs State Bank Of India & Ors on 4 July, 2019

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Mr. Satish Kumar on 27 May, 2024

21. The appellant has mentioned in para 3 of the application that they have received the certified copy of impugned order on 18.07.2023. Even if we consider that the appellant has received the certified copy of the impugned order on 18.07.2023, in this circumstance also, the appellant was expected to file the appeal within the limitation period DISMISSED Page 10 of 11 FA/303/2024 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GEN. INS. CO. LTD. VS. MR. SATISH KUMAR & ORS DOD:27.05.2024 i.e. by 17.08.2023. Still there is delay of 251 days in filing the appeal.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kalyani Transco vs M/S Bhushan Power And Steel Ltd on 26 September, 2025

“126. It appears to us that the Ex-Management and Promoters were moving places to delay the conclusion of proceedings before us. Accordingly, another set of written submissions was filed by Mr. Virendra Ganda, learned Senior Counsel by urging that the judgment of the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal rendered in the case of Standard Chartered Bank v. Satish Kumar Gupta, R.P. concerning Essar Steel Limited in C.A. No. 287 /2019, 288/2019, 289/ 19 and 295/2019 decided on 04.07.2019 was placed before us. Numerous other applications have been filed after the order was reserved which have delayed and interrupted the pronouncement of the order and those applications are as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 74 - Cited by 0 - B R Gavai - Full Document

Kalyani Transco vs M/S Bhushan Power And Steel Ltd on 2 May, 2025

(iii) The NCLT had rightly directed the EBITDA/profit generated by the Corporate Debtor during CIRP to be distributed amongst the creditors in view of the judgment passed by the NCLAT in the matter of Standard Chartered Bank vs. Satish Kumar Gupta, Company Appeal (AT) (INS) No. 242/2019 decided on 04.07.2019. Even the CoC had filed an affidavit before the NCLAT claiming EBITDA generated during the CIRP, however the NCLAT in the impugned judgment directed the Monitoring Committee along with the Resolution Professional to go through the RFP/RFRP and distribute the EBITDA accordingly.
Supreme Court of India Cites 73 - Cited by 0 - B M Trivedi - Full Document

Jsw Steel Ltd vs Mahender Kumar Khandelwal & Anr on 17 February, 2020

(j) The RP is directed to redistribute the profits earned by running the Corporate Debtor during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in accordance with the judgment of the Hon'ble NCLAT rendered in the case of Standard Chartered Bank v. Satish Kumar Gupta, R.P. of Essar Steel Ltd. & Ors., Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 242 of 2019 decided on 04.07.2019 and the action to be taken by the RP is evident from the reading of para 211 of the said judgment.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 29 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Pankaj Gupta & Others on 12 March, 2020

Present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 19.12.2019, passed by III Addl. District Judge, Dehradun, in regular Misc. no. 1120 of 2018, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs Pankaj Gupta and others, by virtue of which, the application moved by the appellant for re-admission of Civil Appeal no. 31 of 2007, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs Pankaj Gupta and others, supported with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was rejected.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - L P Singh - Full Document

Sp Coal Resources Pvt Ltd vs Indus Fila Limited on 23 January, 2023

40. `` The ball starts rolling with the Adjudicating Authority, after admitting an application under either Sections 7, 9 or 10, ordering that a public announcement of the initiation of the CIRP together with calling for the submission of claims under Section 15 shall be made - see Section 13(1)(b) of the Code. For this purpose, the Adjudicating Authority appoints an interim resolution professional in the manner laid down in Section 16 - see Section 13(1)(c) of the Code. In the public announcement of the CIRP, under Sections 15(1), information as to the last date for submission of claims, as may be specified, is to be given; details of the interim resolution professional, who shall be vested with the management of the corporate debtor and be responsible for receiving claims, shall also be given, and the date on which the CIRP shall close is also to be given - see Section 15(1)(c), (d) and (f) of the Code.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next