Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.84 seconds)

C528/2194/2025 on 25 February, 2026

10. Following the aforesaid ratio, present compounding application (IA/1/2025) is allowed. The offences between the parties are permitted to be compounded. As a result, the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1530 of 2023, State Vs. Deepu and Others, under Sections 147, 148, 325, 452, 504 and 506 of IPC, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.)/Judicial Magistrate, Bajpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, are hereby quashed qua the applicants. FIR and charge-sheet filed pursuant thereto stand quashed.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishna vs State Of U.P. And Another on 2 May, 2024

In view thereof, without entering into the merits of the case, the Court concerned is directed to decide the decide Case No. 567 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime No. 126 of 2015 related to charge sheet dated 26.08.2015 (State of U.P. Vs. Deepu and others) under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Pahasu, District Bulandshahar, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 18 months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, if there is no other legal impediment.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kadma & Ors vs State on 3 March, 2011

The accused-appellants have challenged their conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.3, Dholpur in Sessions Case No.51/81 (106/76) State Vs. Deepu & Ors. dated 22.01.1982 by which each of them has been sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment for offence under Section 147 I.P.C. and to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.200/- in default rigorous imprisonment for two months for offence under Section 302 IPC.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - D Singh - Full Document

Smt. Saroj Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 5 Ors on 11 July, 2019

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by applicant Smt. Saroj Yadav against State of U.P. and five others with a prayer for quashing the order dated 2.4.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Firozabad, in S.T. No. 19 of 2016, State of U.P. Vs. Deepu and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 605 of 2013, u/s 364, 307, 147 I.P.C., P.S. Shikohabad, District Firozabad, over an application moved by the applicant under section 311 Cr.P.C., which was rejected, with a further request to direct the trial court to summon the prosecution witnesses PW1, PW2 and PW3 by way of allowing applicant's application dated 21.1.2019, so that justice may be done.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R K Gautam - Full Document

Bitola Pandey vs State Of U.P. on 15 May, 2024

8. After submission of charge sheet, cognizance was taken upon same by concerned Magistrate in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 190(1)(b) Cr.P.C. Thereafter the concerned Magistrate in terms of Section 203 Cr.P.C. committed the case to the Court of Sessions. Resultantly, Sessions Trial No. 293 of 2015 (State of U.P. Vs. Vineet Tiwari) came into existence. During the course of aforementioned Sessions Trial, the statement of PW-1 Sunil Kumar first informant/uncle of the deceased and PW-2 Anil Kumar Agnihotri (father of the deceased) were recorded. After the statement-in-chief/examination-in-chief of aforesaid witnesses were recorded, prosecution filed an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. stating therein that since the complicity of named but not charge sheeted accused is also established in the crime in question as per the deposition of aforesaid witnesses, therefore, they be also summoned to face trial in aforesaid sessions trial. This application came to be allowed by Court below vide order dated 08.07.2022.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Deepu And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 October, 2025

2. The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionists to set aside the judgment and order dated 15.11.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Court No. 3, Deoria in Sessions Trial No. 253 of 2022 (State Vs. Deepu and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 138 of 2018, under Sections 323, 324 and 308 I.P.C., Police Station Lar, District Kanpur Deoria whereby discharge application moved u/s 227 Cr.P.C. by the revisionists under Section 227 Cr.P.C. has been rejected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vineet Kumar Pandey & Others vs State Of U.P. & Another on 24 August, 2021

This petition has been filed by the applicants for quashing of the impugned criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.1408 of 2019 State versus Vineet Kumar Pandey and others as well as charge-sheet No.249 of 2017 dated 17.11.2017, arising out of case crime No.409 of 2017 under section 447 I.P.C. and section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, P.S. Gola, district Kheri.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - K S Pawar - Full Document

Deepu @ Devesh And 5 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 5 September, 2022

This application has been filed for quashing the cognizance order dated 19.04.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act) Court No.27, District Agra in Sessions Case No. 563 of 2022 (State Vs. Deepu @ Devesh and others) under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 506, 354 I.P.C. Section 7/8 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) 2012 read with Section 3 (1) (Da), 3 (1) (Gha), 3 (2) (Va) SC/ST Act, Police Tajganj, District Agra as well as to quash the proceedings of the aforesaid case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - G Chowdhary - Full Document

Deepu And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 10 November, 2022

The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants namely Deepu, Ashish Kumar and Sonu with the prayer to quash/set aside the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.507 of 2021 (State Vs. Deepu and others), arising out of Case Crime No.0073 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 452, 506, 308, 336, 188, 269 I.P.C. & Section 3 of the Mahamari Adhiniyam, 1897 and Section 51 of the Aapda Prabandhan Adhiniyam, 2005, Police Station Dhammaur, District Sultanpur pending before the court of First Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.1, sultanpur as well as impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 05.04.2021 along with charge sheet filed therein.
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next