Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.36 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Kamala Bai vs Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Electricity ... on 21 September, 1990

Kamla Bai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 December, 2018

No document has been filed by the petitioner to establish that the petitioner is the title holder. There is no order of allotment in favour of the petitioner, on the contrary, the record reveals that it was a government building in which a School was functional. Later on mercy was shown to the petitioner and she was permitted to live in the building temporarily and thereafter, she wanted to install idol of Durgaji to give the colour of a temple to the building. The Sub Divisional Officer has directed the Tehsildar to take appropriate action in accordance with law, keeping in view the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Lok Parisar (Bedakhali) Adhiniyam, 1974. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE Writ Petition No.29261/2018 (Kamla Bai Vs. State of M. P. and Others) -3- Learned Government Advocate has argued before this Court that the Tehsildar has issued a show cause notice on 20/11/2018 and he shall be following prescribed procedure as prescribed under the statute.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kaila Bai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 August, 2019

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. As per Kafiyat report, the applicant Kaila Bai has been shown as absconder and the charge-sheet has been filed. Looking to the aforesaid allegation leveled against the applicant, the fact and circumstance of the case and without commenting on merits of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to 3 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.28622/2019 (Smt. Kaila Bai Vs The State of M.P.) the applicant. Hence, the second bail application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. is rejected.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - R K Shrivastava - Full Document

Kamla Bai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 November, 2020

Perusal of documents filed by the appellant show that appellant is a patient of Hiatus Hernia. The documents received from the jail authorities show that treatment is being afforded to the appellant from February, 2020 onwards and she has also been shown at M. Y. Hospital, Indore on 17.07.2020. The aforesaid documents do show that the appellant has been having problem since quite sometime. However, as already observed earlier by this Court, treatment can be 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.1495 of 2020 (Kamala Bai vs. State of MP) provided from District Hospital at Ujjain or if needed, at M. Y. Hospital, Indore.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Shukla - Full Document

Lokmanya Grih Nirman Cooperative ... vs Devkrishna Shukla on 19 August, 2019

Learned senior counsel Mr. Chitaley appearing with Mr. Kostubh Pathak has argued before this Court that this Court does not have the power to impose the cost beyond the limit prescribed u/S. 35, 35A and 35B of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Reliance has been placed upon the judgment delivered by this Court in the case of Smt. Kamla Bai Vs. Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and ors., reported in 1992 MPLJ 214.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S C Sharma - Full Document

Kamla Bai vs State Of M.P. on 16 July, 2021

After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE Cr.A. No.706/2021 (Kamla Bai Vs. State of M.P.) -2- for the parties and looking to the fact that the appellant is in jail since 25.02.2020 and during trial she was released on bail and she did not misuse the liberty granted to her and as per statements of eye witnesses- Ashok PW1, Shobhachand PW2, Rameshwar PW3, Rajaram PW4, Mahesh PW5; at the time of incident, the appellant No.1 - Kalabai had thrown only one stone, due to which the deceased received only simple injury. This appeal is recently filed and there is no likelihood of final hearing of this appeal in near future, I find it is to be a fit case to suspend the custodial sentence of appellant No.2- Kala Bai.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Verma - Full Document

Smt.Kamla Bai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 June, 2014

Applicants apprehend arrest in respect of offences u/Ss. 353, 332 and 452/34 of IPC where both the applicants are woman aged about 63 and 35 years who are alleged with house trespassing, giving abusive words and causing minor injury to the complainant who is government servant and impulse more than intent seems to be the foundation of the incident and since there are no criminal antecedents, this Court, without 2 Smt. Kamla Bai and Another Vs. State of M.P. M.Cr.C.No.3992/2014 expressing any opinion on merits of the case, is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicants.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next