Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Rakesh Manocha vs Rajinder Kumar on 14 February, 2019

Deepak Gulati vs Mahesh Saimwal on 9 December, 2024

Per Contra, it is submitted by Ld. Counsel for accused that cheque in question was given as a security for rent by the accused. It is further submitted that the legal demand notice has not been received by the accused. Furthermore, one bill is raised by the complainant for five years of professional service which seems impractical in general practice. Moreover, it has been admitted by the complainant that he continued to provide the services to accused even after filing the present complaint. In addition to that, Ld. Counsel for accused has further stated that no professional fee is due upon the accused. This casts a doubt on the story of the complainant. Therefore, it is submitted that no prima facie case has been established by the complainant and in view of the same, accused is entitled to be acquitted. Reliance is placed on as Crl. Appeal no. 636 of 2019, in case Basalingappa Vs. Mudibasappa, Supreme Court of India and Rakesh Manocha Vs. Sh. Rajinder Kumar,.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1